Vector population responses to control interventions

In 1981, Kenyan authorities attempted eradication of tsetse (Glossina pallidipes) from the Lambwe valley, by sequential aerial spraying of endosulfan. Fly populations were reduced by over 99.9% in the main habitats, but recovered to their original levels within one year. In 1986, an Argentine research team attempted local elimination of domestic Triatominae (Triatoma infestans) in an area of Santiago del Estero. House infestation rates were reduced to an apparent zero, but recovered to pre-control levels in two years. In Sri Lanka, a combination of mosquito control with active case detection and treatment reduced malaria incidence to just 17 cases in 1964. Interruption of the programme then saw case incidence return to over 500,000 by 1969. These three examples-from African trypanosomiasis, South American Chagas disease and malaria-all illustrate the same process. Vector populations, infestation rates, and rates of disease transmission, can be reduced. The real problem is not in achieving the initial reduction, but in subsequently either driving the disease to extinction or maintaining it below acceptable levels. And this problem takes us beyond the simple analysis of interventions, into the complex realms of population behaviour set in its political, social and economic context. It seems that we have been too rarely concerned to plan and implement the long term surveillance and selective interventions that are required to translate initial gains into real success. In biological terms, we tend to ignore the complexity and robustness of vector populations and disease transmission cycles, especially their varied capacity to recover from interference. Moreover, in socio-political terms, a reduced problem-even one representing potential for future catastrophe-tends to claim less priority than present problems, even though premature redeployment of resources may abnegate gains already achieved. The problem is strongly compounded by methods of economic analysis where the benefits of avoiding future problems are strongly discounted in favour of short-term temporary gains. This paper seeks to open discussion on these long-term planning issues.