Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How persistent and general is the contextual interference effect?

Daniel M Russell1, Karl M Newell

  • 1Division of Science, The Pennsylvania State University, Reading 19610, USA. dmr18@psu.edu

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
|October 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Sequence (S) index as a marker of diminished step-to-step transition efficiency in older adults.

Frontiers in human neuroscience·2026
Same author

EEG and IMU Gait Signal Processing: A Comparative Assessment of the "Reza" Exponential Filter and Classical Filters.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Gait variability is more strongly associated with walking speed than with age.

Gait & posture·2025
Same author

Neck Angle in the Handstand Changes the Pattern of Multi-Joint Variability.

Journal of motor behavior·2025
Same author

Wobble Board Instability Enhances Compensatory CoP Responses to CoM Movement Across Timescales.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2025
Same author

Age-related changes in gait coordination are focused on the step-to-step transition.

Journal of biomechanics·2025
Same journal

A One-Year Longitudinal Impact Tracking Study of Participation in Physical Education on Academic Achievements of Chinese High School Students From the Perspective of Development Trajectory Visualization.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Perceived, but Not Neuromuscular, Fatigue Demonstrated After Doubles Pickleball Competitions.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

In- and Out-of-Possession Running and Technical-Tactical Performance in Soccer.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Effect of Visual Illusion on Motor Skills Learning in Boys With Developmental Coordination Disorder: A School-Based Randomized Controlled Trial.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Challenge Under Pressure Contextual Interference or Differential Learning.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
Same journal

Examining Native Hawaiian and Pacific Islander Youth Attitudes Toward Physical Activity and Physical Education.

Research quarterly for exercise and sport·2026
See all related articles

The contextual interference effect showed limited persistence and generality in a rapid aiming task. Random practice offered retention benefits only for the practiced task, not for new ones.

Area of Science:

  • Motor Learning
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human Movement Science

Background:

  • The contextual interference (CI) effect suggests random practice enhances motor skill learning compared to blocked practice.
  • However, the persistence and generality of this effect across different tasks and retention intervals require further investigation.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To examine the persistence and generality of the CI effect in a rapid sequential aiming task.
  • To determine if random practice leads to superior retention and transfer compared to blocked practice.

Main Methods:

  • Forty-eight participants practiced three movement patterns under either blocked (BL) or random (RA) practice schedules.
  • A 24-hour delayed retention test and a transfer test with a novel movement pattern were administered.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Knowledge of Results (KR) and movement patterns were provided throughout.

    • Main Results:

    • Random practice (RA) showed an advantage for RA retention but not for blocked (BL) retention, contradicting the typical CI effect.
    • Group differences observed during retention were not persistent at the transfer test.
    • Limited persistence and generality of the CI effect were observed.

    Conclusions:

    • Random practice does not necessarily yield enhanced, context-free motor learning.
    • Random practice may be essential for developing task-switching abilities.
    • The CI effect's influence on motor learning may be less persistent and general than previously assumed.