Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Conditional tests in a competing risks model.

Solari Aldo1, Luigi Salmaso, Hammou El Barmi

  • 1Department of Statistics, University of Padova, Via C. Battisti 241/243, Padova 35121, Italy. solari@stat.unipd.it

Lifetime Data Analysis
|October 19, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical, microbiological, and laboratory predictors of on- and off-label dalbavancin treatment failure.

Journal of global antimicrobial resistance·2025
Same author

Lessons from the pandemic era: do we need new strategies to improve conservative treatment adherence in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis? A retrospective analysis.

European journal of translational myology·2024
Same author

Hydroxy-Carboxylic Acids as Green and Abundant Ligands for Sustainable Recovery of Copper from a Multimetallic Powder: A Proof of Concept.

ChemSusChem·2024
Same author

Personalized prediction of optimal water intake in adult population by blended use of machine learning and clinical data.

Scientific reports·2022
Same author

Machine learning and design of experiments with an application to product innovation in the chemical industry.

Journal of applied statistics·2022
Same author

Multivariate nonparametric methods in two-way balanced designs: performances and limitations in small samples.

Journal of applied statistics·2022
Same journal

Shared frailty sieve estimation for dependent left truncated and interval censored data.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Functional win-fractions regression models for composite outcomes.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Variable selection in causal semiparametric transformation models with all-or-nothing treatment compliance.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Correction to: A uniformisation-driven algorithm for inference-related estimation of a phase-type ageing model.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Unobserved heterogeneity in threshold regression based on the hitting times of a reflected Brownian motion for recurrent hypoglycemia.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
Same journal

Variable selection with broken adaptive ridge regression for interval-censored competing risks data.

Lifetime data analysis·2026
See all related articles

This study introduces conditional tests for competing risks, offering a more powerful alternative to traditional asymptotic methods. These conditional tests improve statistical power for analyzing cumulative incidence functions (CIFs) and cause-specific hazard rates (CSHRs).

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Survival Analysis
  • Statistical Inference

Background:

  • Competing risks analysis is crucial in medical research.
  • Existing tests for equality of cumulative incidence functions (CIFs) or cause-specific hazard rates (CSHRs) often use complicated finite sample distributions.
  • Asymptotic distributions can result in conservative statistical tests.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and evaluate conditional tests for comparing competing risks.
  • To enhance the power of statistical tests in survival analysis.
  • To provide a practical method for implementing these tests in real-world scenarios.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing conditional distributions of test statistics, conditional on observed data.
  • Developing tests initially for two competing risks (k=2) and extending to multiple risks (k>2).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Employing a simulation study to compare the power of conditional versus asymptotic tests.

    • Main Results:

    • Conditional tests demonstrate a gain in statistical power compared to tests based on asymptotic distributions.
    • The proposed methodology is effective for both two and multiple competing risks scenarios.
    • A real-life example illustrates the practical application of conditional tests.

    Conclusions:

    • Conditional tests offer a more powerful approach for analyzing competing risks data.
    • The method provides a valuable alternative to existing techniques, improving statistical efficiency.
    • Implementation of conditional tests can lead to more accurate and sensitive comparisons of CIFs and CSHRs.