Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Detection and Monitoring of Tumor Associated Circulating DNA in Patient Biofluids
Published on: June 8, 2019
Comparing two diagnostic laboratory tests for Williams syndrome: fluorescent in situ hybridization versus multiplex
Johanna M van Hagen1, Hubertus J F M M Eussen, Ron van Schooten
1Department of Clinical Genetics, VU University Medical Center, 1007 MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands. a.vanhagen@Vumc.nl
Abstract:
Most people with Williams syndrome (WS) have a heterozygous 1.55 Mb deletion on chromosome 7q11.23. For diagnostic purposes, fluorescence in situ hybridisation (FISH) with commercial FISH probes is commonly used to detect this deletion. We investigated whether multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA) is a reliable alternative for FISH. The MLPA kit (SALSA P029) contains probes for eight genes in the WS critical region: FKBP6, FZD9, TBL2, STX1A, ELN, LIMK1, RFC2, and CYLN2. The experimental FISH assay that was used consists of four probes covering the WS critical region. A total number of 63 patients was tested; in 53 patients, a deletion was detected both with FISH and MLPA(P029), in 10 patients both techniques failed to demonstrate a deletion. In only one patient, a deletion was detected which was not previously detected by two commercial FISH probes. This patient appeared to carry a small, atypical deletion. We conclude that MLPA is a reliable technique to detect WS. Compared with FISH, MLPA is less time consuming and has the possibility to detect also smaller, atypical deletions and duplications in the WS critical region.

