Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task
Published on: July 22, 2025
Laws, constraints, and the modeling relation--history and interpretations
1Department of Systems Science and Industrial Engineering, T.J. Watson School of Engineering, State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902-6000, USA. hpattee@adelphia.net
This study explores Robert Rosen's complementary theories on the modeling relation in complex systems. It contrasts the organism's internal modeling for life and evolution with the brain's external modeling for understanding life.
Area of Science:
- Complex Systems Theory
- Theoretical Biology
- Philosophy of Science
Background:
- Robert Rosen's work on anticipatory systems and the modeling relation is foundational in theoretical biology.
- The author collaborated with Rosen from 1970-1987, developing models for complex systems with non-integrable constraints.
- Rosen's work, particularly 'Anticipatory Systems' and 'Life Itself', presents distinct perspectives on modeling and its relation to life and evolution.
Purpose of the Study:
- To contrast Rosen's concept of the internal modeling relation within organisms (necessary for life and evolution) with the external modeling relation of the brain (necessary for understanding life).
- To compare the author's focus on the physical realization of abstract modeling relations and symbolic control for evolution with Rosen's formal, mathematical-symbol system approach.
- To analyze the divergence in Rosen's views on physics and evolution between 'Anticipatory Systems' and 'Life Itself'.
Main Methods:
- Comparative analysis of Robert Rosen's key works: 'Anticipatory Systems' and 'Life Itself'.
- Conceptual framework contrasting formal relational conditions with physical realization conditions for modeling relations.
- Exploration of symbolic control mechanisms enabling open-ended evolution in complex systems.
Main Results:
- Rosen's work offers two complementary views on the modeling relation: internal to organisms for life, and external (brain) for understanding life.
- The author's approach emphasizes the physical basis and evolutionary implications of modeling relations, complementing Rosen's formalisms.
- Significant differences in Rosen's perspectives on physics and evolution across his publications are identified and discussed.
Conclusions:
- The modeling relation is crucial both for the existence of life and for our comprehension of it.
- Complementary approaches focusing on formal and physical aspects of modeling relations provide a richer understanding of complex systems and evolution.
- Further investigation into the evolution of Rosen's thought is warranted to fully grasp the nuances of his contributions to systems theory.
Related Concept Videos
Models, Theories, and Laws
Constraints and Statical Determinacy
Sources of Law
Constitutional law is foundational, deriving from federal and state constitutions, and...
Limit Laws I
Modeling and Similitude
Scientific Laws and Theories