Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Early face processing specificity: it's in the eyes!

Roxane J Itier1, Claude Alain, Katherine Sedore

  • 1Rotman Research Institute, Baycrest Centre, Toronto, Canada. ritier@rotman-baycrest.on.ca

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
|October 26, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Young and old adult brains experience opposite effects of acute sleep restriction on the functional connectivity network.

Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)·2026
Same author

The Effect of the Temporal Position of a Gap on Its Automatic Detection.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Enhanced Contour-Deviant Mismatch Negativity and Mnemonic Representations in Older Musicians.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Face memory is shaped more by fixation durations and sequences than by where observers fixate within the face.

Journal of vision·2026
Same author

Functional Dissociation of Mismatch Negativity From Late Discriminative Negativity Across the Adult Lifespan.

The European journal of neuroscience·2026
Same author

Electrophysiological Assessment of Semantic Processing of Cochlear Implant Users Using an Audiobook.

Trends in hearing·2026
Same journal

Sensorimotor Adaptation of Vocal Pitch Is Impaired in Cerebellar Ataxia.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Memory in the Palm of Your Hand: Smartphone-based Methods for Measuring Memory in the Wild.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Processing Asymmetry in Object-modifying Relative Clauses: Evidence from Functional Connectivity.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Extensive Experience Remodels Neural Task Circuitry to Escape the Frontal Bottleneck and Increase Automaticity of Categorization.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Investigating the Effects of Acute Stress on Neural Mechanisms of Self-controlled Decision-making.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
Same journal

Distilling the Neurophenomenological Signatures of Pure Awareness during Transcendental Meditation.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2026
See all related articles

The eyes are crucial for face recognition, driving specific brain responses like the N170 event-related potential. Removing eyes eliminates these face-specific processing effects, highlighting their central role.

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • Faces are processed configurally, unlike most objects.
  • Face inversion and contrast reversal elicit an increased N170 amplitude, an event-related potential.
  • This N170 response is considered an early indicator of face-specific processing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether the eye region mediates the face-specific N170 effects.
  • To determine if the presence of eyes is necessary for configural face processing.
  • To propose a neural model explaining dynamic response modulation in face processing.

Main Methods:

  • Presented participants with intact faces, inverted faces, contrast-reversed faces, and faces with eyes removed.
  • Recorded scalp-based event-related potentials, specifically focusing on the N170 component.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Analyzed N170 amplitude differences across various face stimuli conditions.

    • Main Results:

    • Face-specific N170 effects (increased amplitude) were observed for inverted and contrast-reversed faces.
    • These N170 effects disappeared when the eyes were removed from the face stimuli.
    • The presence of eyes was essential for eliciting the characteristic N170 response to face manipulations.

    Conclusions:

    • The eye region is the primary mediator of face-specific processing effects observed in the N170.
    • The N170 response to manipulated faces likely reflects the processing of the eyes within a face context.
    • A neural model involving dynamic modulation by face- and eye-selective neurons in the superior temporal sulcus can account for these findings, suggesting eyes are central to face specialization.