Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 10, 2026

07:13
Comparison of Predictive Performance of Three Lymph Node Staging Systems in Colorectal Signet Ring Cell Carcinoma Based on Machine Learning Model
Published on: April 18, 2025
A decision tool for predicting sentinel node accuracy from breast tumor size and grade
Nathan Coombs1, Wanqing Chen, Richard Taylor
1NSW Breast Cancer Institute, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.
The Breast Journal
|November 7, 2007
Summary
Predicting breast cancer axillary lymph node involvement is crucial. This study developed simple formulas to estimate nodal positivity and sentinel lymph node biopsy false-negative rates for screen-detected breast cancer patients.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Surgical Oncology
- Diagnostic Imaging
Background:
- Accurate preoperative prediction of axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer is essential for effective treatment planning.
- Screen-detected breast cancers often present at earlier stages (T1/T2), necessitating precise staging to guide management.
- Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is a standard procedure, but its accuracy depends on factors like tumor characteristics.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop simple predictive formulas for axillary lymph node involvement in breast cancer.
- To estimate the probability of false-negative results in sentinel node biopsy based on tumor size and grade.
- To provide clinicians with tools for informed decision-making in managing screen-detected breast cancer.
Main Methods:
- Analysis of tumor pathology reports from 4,585 women with T1/T2 breast cancer in New South Wales (1996-1999).
- Linear regression analysis to establish equations predicting nodal positivity based on tumor size and grade.
- Calculation of false-negative SLNB rates using published data and derived formulas.
Main Results:
- Nodal involvement was present in 23.8% of the study cohort.
- A linear relationship was established: node positivity frequency (%) = 1.5 x tumor size (mm) + (2, 6, or 10) for grade I, II, or III tumors, respectively.
- The probability of a false-negative SLNB ranged from 0.8% (5mm, grade I) to 6.0% (50mm, grade III), assuming a 7.5% false-negative rate.
Conclusions:
- Simple, clinically applicable formulas can predict axillary lymph node involvement and SLNB false-negative rates.
- These tools aid surgeons in counseling patients regarding the absolute probability of false-negative SLNB.
- For large T2 tumors, axillary dissection may be preferable to SLNB alone due to under-staging risks and higher positive node probability.
