Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Cell Polarization by Rho Proteins01:21

Cell Polarization by Rho Proteins

Cell polarity is the asymmetric distribution of cellular and membrane components, making one side of the cell different from the other. This polarity is essential to many processes such as embryogenesis, axon migration, glucose transport across epithelial cells, and directional cell migration. A migrating cell responds to intracellular or extracellular signals via molecular cascades that reorganize the actin cytoskeleton to establish this polarity. In these cells, the Rho family proteins Cdc42,...
Small GTPases - Ras and Rho01:24

Small GTPases - Ras and Rho

Ras and Rho are small monomeric GTPases that act downstream of receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK) and regulate various cellular processes. These GTPases switch between active and inactive states by binding to guanine nucleotides.
Three regulatory proteins control their activity:
Rab Proteins01:14

Rab Proteins

Rab proteins constitute the largest family of monomeric GTPases, of which 70 members are present in humans. Rab proteins and their effectors regulate consecutive stages of vesicle transport such as vesicle transport, docking, and fusion to the correct recipient membrane.
Rab proteins switch between a cytosolic, GDP-bound inactive state and a membrane-anchored, GTP-bound active state. By themselves, Rabs show slow rates of GDP/GTP exchange and GTP hydrolysis. Thus, Rab proteins are considered...
Mechanism of Lamellipodia Formation01:31

Mechanism of Lamellipodia Formation

Cells migrating in response to external stimuli form lamellipodia, which are thin membrane protrusions supported by a mesh of linked, branched, or unbranched actin filaments. These actin filaments interact with myosin motor proteins, creating the dynamic actomyosin complex within the cytoskeleton. Contractility, or the ability to generate contractile stress, is inherent to the actomyosin complex. It helps cells detect the stiffness of the surrounding ECM and exert contractile force for...
Assembly of Signaling Complexes01:30

Assembly of Signaling Complexes

Multiprotein signaling complexes are formed in a dynamic process involving protein-protein interactions at the cytoplasmic domain of transmembrane receptors or enzymatic and non-enzymatic proteins associated with the receptor. These complexes ensure the activation and propagation of intracellular signals that regulate cell functions.
Interaction domains in cell signaling
Interaction domains recognize exposed features of their binding partners containing post-translationally modified sequences,...
MAPK Signaling Cascades01:07

MAPK Signaling Cascades

Mitogen-activated protein kinase, or MAPK pathway, activates three sequential kinases to regulate cellular responses such as proliferation, differentiation, survival, and apoptosis. The canonical MAPK pathway starts with a mitogen or growth factor binding to an RTK. The activated RTKs stimulate Ras, which recruits Raf or MAP3 Kinase (MAPKKK), the first kinase of the MAPK signaling cascade. Raf further phosphorylates and activates MEK or MAP2 Kinases (MAPKK), which in turn phosphorylates MAP...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Structural basis of the protein kinase PKN1 HR1 domain oligomerization and differential regulation by RhoA and Rac1.

The Journal of biological chemistry·2026
Same author

Unique Microswitches Positioned Extracellular to the Orthosteric Binding Site Initiate Activation in the β<sub>1</sub>-Adrenergic Receptor.

Journal of chemical information and modeling·2026
Same author

Cyclized Peptide Inhibitors of the Small G Protein Cdc42 Mimic Binding of Effector Proteins.

Biochemistry·2026
Same author

Direct observation of small molecule activator binding to single PR65 protein.

Npj biosensing·2025
Same author

Investigating the Interactions of the Cucumber Mosaic Virus 2b Protein with the Viral 1a Replicase Component and the Cellular RNA Silencing Factor Argonaute 1.

Viruses·2024
Same author

Decreased Water Mobility Contributes To Increased α-Synuclein Aggregation.

Angewandte Chemie (Weinheim an der Bergstrasse, Germany)·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays
10:37

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays

Published on: October 8, 2015

The Rac1 polybasic region is required for interaction with its effector PRK1.

Rakhee Modha1, Louise J Campbell1, Daniel Nietlispach1

  • 1Department of Biochemistry, University of Cambridge, 80, Tennis Court Road, Cambridge CB2 1GA, United Kingdom.

The Journal of Biological Chemistry
|November 17, 2007
PubMed
Summary

This study reveals how a protein called PRK1 interacts with a G protein called Rac1. Researchers used structural analysis to show that PRK1's HR1b domain binds to the C-terminal region of Rac1. This region, which is often ignored in studies, plays a role in both effector binding and membrane interaction. The findings suggest that the C-terminal region of Rac1 is important for signaling and could influence how PRK1 regulates the cytoskeleton.

Keywords:
Rac1 structurePRK1 bindingG protein effector interactionC-terminal region function

Frequently Asked Questions

More Related Videos

Identification of Post-translational Modifications of Plant Protein Complexes
10:07

Identification of Post-translational Modifications of Plant Protein Complexes

Published on: February 22, 2014

Spatio-Temporal Manipulation of Small GTPase Activity at Subcellular Level and on Timescale of Seconds in Living Cells
10:27

Spatio-Temporal Manipulation of Small GTPase Activity at Subcellular Level and on Timescale of Seconds in Living Cells

Published on: March 9, 2012

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays
10:37

Comparing the Affinity of GTPase-binding Proteins using Competition Assays

Published on: October 8, 2015

Identification of Post-translational Modifications of Plant Protein Complexes
10:07

Identification of Post-translational Modifications of Plant Protein Complexes

Published on: February 22, 2014

Spatio-Temporal Manipulation of Small GTPase Activity at Subcellular Level and on Timescale of Seconds in Living Cells
10:27

Spatio-Temporal Manipulation of Small GTPase Activity at Subcellular Level and on Timescale of Seconds in Living Cells

Published on: March 9, 2012

Area of Science:

  • Structural biology of signaling proteins
  • Rho GTPase signaling pathways
  • Protein kinase interactions in cytoskeletal regulation

Background:

Understanding how Rho family G proteins interact with their effectors is central to deciphering cytoskeletal regulation and cell signaling. Prior research has shown that PRK1 can bind to Rho family members like Rac1 and RhoA through its HR1 domains. However, the structural basis for these interactions, particularly involving the C-terminal regions of G proteins, remains unclear. While previous studies have described general binding preferences, the specific role of the polybasic region in Rac1 has not been fully resolved. This uncertainty motivated researchers to investigate the structural details of the HR1b-Rac1 interaction. The absence of structural data on the C-terminal region of Rac1 has left a gap in understanding how it contributes to effector binding. Additionally, the functional significance of the polybasic region in membrane association remains debated. This study aims to address these questions by analyzing the HR1b-Rac1 complex. The findings could clarify how structural features of G proteins influence their effector interactions.

Purpose Of The Study:

The goal of this study was to determine the structural basis for the interaction between PRK1's HR1b domain and Rac1. Researchers aimed to understand how HR1b recognizes and binds to Rac1, focusing on the C-terminal region and the polybasic domain. By comparing this interaction with previously studied HR1a-RhoA structures, the team sought to identify conserved and novel binding features. The study also aimed to clarify the role of the polybasic region in Rac1's interaction with HR1b. A key question was whether this region contributes to effector binding or membrane association. The researchers wanted to test if the polybasic region forms a new recognition element in G protein-effector interactions. They also aimed to assess whether this region's involvement in binding affects its availability for membrane interactions. The study's results could provide insights into the structural diversity of Rho G protein signaling.

Main Methods:

The researchers used solution NMR spectroscopy to determine the structure of the HR1b-Rac1 complex. They included the C-terminal polybasic region of Rac1 in their analysis, which is often excluded in structural studies. The team compared the HR1b-Rac1 structure with previously published HR1a-RhoA structures to identify similarities and differences. They analyzed the binding interface between HR1b and the C-terminal region of Rac1. The study focused on the interactions between the polybasic region and residues in HR1b. The researchers also examined how the polybasic region's orientation affects membrane interactions. They used structural modeling to visualize the binding interface and identify key residues. The study combined experimental data with computational analysis to validate their findings.

Main Results:

The HR1b-Rac1 complex structure revealed that HR1b binds to the C-terminal end of the effector loop and switch 2 of Rac1. This binding region overlaps with one of the contact sites observed in the HR1a-RhoA structure. The C-terminal polybasic region of Rac1 was found to reverse in direction to interact with residues in switch 2. The polybasic region itself formed interactions with residues in HR1b. These interactions did not block the polybasic region from contacting membrane phospholipids. The study showed that the polybasic region contributes to a novel recognition element in effector binding. The structure demonstrated that the C-terminal region of Rac1 plays a structural role in effector recognition. This is the first structural evidence of a G protein's C-terminal region forming a new recognition site for effectors.

Conclusions:

The study provides the first structural evidence that the C-terminal region of a Rho family G protein forms a novel recognition element for effector binding. The researchers showed that the polybasic region of Rac1 interacts with HR1b while remaining available for membrane association. This finding suggests that the polybasic region contributes to both effector binding and membrane interaction. The structural comparison with HR1a-RhoA revealed conserved and divergent features in G protein-effector interactions. The study supports the idea that the C-terminal region of Rac1 is functionally important in signaling. The results clarify how structural elements of G proteins influence effector specificity. The researchers concluded that the polybasic region is essential for the HR1b-Rac1 interaction. These findings could inform future studies on Rho G protein signaling mechanisms.

The polybasic region interacts with HR1b and remains available for membrane phospholipid binding.

HR1b binds to the C-terminal end of the effector loop and switch 2 of Rac1, similar to HR1a-RhoA interactions.

It forms a novel recognition element that contributes to effector specificity.

No, the interactions with HR1b do not prevent membrane phospholipid binding.

It highlights conserved and divergent features in G protein-effector interactions.

The polybasic region contributes to both effector binding and membrane association.