Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs01:15

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs play a pivotal role in testing the effectiveness of various treatments. Key among these are the repeated measures, cross-over, carry-over, and Latin square designs. In the repeated measures design, each subject receives all treatments, allowing for temporal comparisons. This type of design is useful in reducing variability but requires careful planning to avoid bias.The cross-over design, an economical method, involves sequential administration of...
Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding01:25

Strategies for Assessing and Addressing Confounding

Confounding is a critical issue in epidemiological studies, often leading to misleading conclusions about associations between exposures and outcomes. It occurs when the relationship between the exposure and the outcome is mixed with the effects of other factors that influence the outcome. Given that, addressing confounding is of high importance for drawing accurate inferences in research.
Confounding can be addressed at both the design phase of a study and through analytical methods after data...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs01:20

Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs

Bioequivalence experimental study designs are crucial methodologies used in evaluating and comparing the bioavailability of different drug products. These designs are categorized into various types: completely randomized, randomized block, repeated measures, cross and carry-over, and Latin square designs.Completely randomized designs involve randomly allocating treatments to all subjects participating in the experiment. This allocation is achieved by assigning unique random numbers to subjects...
Methods of Medium Optimization01:28

Methods of Medium Optimization

Optimizing growth media enhances microbial proliferation and maximizes product yield. Statistical experimental design methodologies provide structured and reproducible approaches, offering progressively higher levels of robustness and efficiency.The One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) MethodThe One-Factor-at-a-Time (OFAT) method involves adjusting a single variable while keeping all others constant. However, it cannot detect interactions between variables, often leading to suboptimal outcomes when...
Crossover Experiments01:16

Crossover Experiments

Crossover experiments, also called the repeated-measurements design, is a study design in which all experimental units are exposed to all treatments in different periods. Crossover experiments are generally used in psychology, the pharmaceutical industry, agriculture, and medicine.
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups01:20

Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups

Survival analysis is a cornerstone of medical research, used to evaluate the time until an event of interest occurs, such as death, disease recurrence, or recovery. Unlike standard statistical methods, survival analysis is particularly adept at handling censored data—instances where the event has not occurred for some participants by the end of the study or remains unobserved. To address these unique challenges, specialized techniques like the Kaplan-Meier estimator, log-rank test, and Cox...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The pyruvate kinase activator etavopivat (FT-4202) limits pulmonary and systemic sequelae of sepsis in a mouse LPS model.

American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology·2026
Same author

Power Calculation for Non-inferiority Test Based on Linear Combination of Two Correlated Binary Endpoints.

Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science·2026
Same author

Controversial issues in clinical investigation of rare disease drug development.

Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics·2026
Same author

Switching Design for Assessment of Interchangeability in Biosimilar Studies.

Pharmaceutics·2026
Same author

Comparative Efficacy of Daratumumab Based Regimens in Patients With Relapsed-Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM) Aged 70 and Above: A Multicenter Study.

European journal of haematology·2026
Same author

Acupuncture for acute musculoskeletal pain in the emergency department and clinic: a pragmatic randomized trial.

Pain medicine (Malden, Mass.)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 10, 2026

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models (SVEM)
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models (SVEM)

Published on: August 18, 2023

Analysis strategies for adaptive designs with multiple endpoints.

Mark Chang1, Shein-Chung Chow

  • 1Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA. mark.chang@statisticians.org

Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics
|November 21, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces a novel fractal gatekeeper procedure for analyzing adaptive clinical trials with multiple endpoints. This method effectively addresses multiplicity issues, ensuring robust statistical validity in complex trial designs.

More Related Videos

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 10, 2026

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models (SVEM)
13:54

A Workflow for Lipid Nanoparticle (LNP) Formulation Optimization using Designed Mixture-Process Experiments and Self-Validated Ensemble Models (SVEM)

Published on: August 18, 2023

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow
08:58

Efficient Sampling of Genetically Encoded Biosensor Design Space Enabled with a Design of Experiments and Automation Workflow

Published on: October 17, 2025

Area of Science:

  • Biostatistics
  • Clinical Trial Design
  • Statistical Methodology

Background:

  • Adaptive designs offer flexibility but introduce challenges in statistical analysis, particularly with multiple endpoints.
  • The issue of multiplicity, where multiple statistical tests increase the chance of false positives, is a critical concern in clinical trials.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review existing methods for handling multiplicity in classical and adaptive trial designs.
  • To propose and illustrate a novel fractal gatekeeper procedure for analyzing adaptive trials with multiple endpoints.

Main Methods:

  • A review of common multiplicity adjustment methods (e.g., gatekeeper procedures).
  • Application of the fractal gatekeeper procedure, leveraging the invariance property of the test statistic.
  • Demonstration using practical examples from simulated adaptive trials.

Main Results:

  • The fractal gatekeeper procedure provides a robust strategy for managing multiplicity in adaptive trials.
  • The proposed method is illustrated effectively through practical examples, showing its applicability.

Conclusions:

  • The fractal gatekeeper procedure is a valuable tool for the statistical analysis of adaptive trials with multiple endpoints.
  • This approach enhances the reliability of findings from complex clinical trial designs.