Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Closure of a Patent Foramen Ovale (PFO): An Intervention Sequence
Published on: December 23, 2022
Patent foramen ovale and unexplained ischemic cerebrovascular events in children
Mirjana Perkovic Benedik1, Marjan Zaletel, Nuska Pecaric Meglic
1University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Insights
The role of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in pediatric ischemic cerebrovascular events of unknown cause may be underestimated. Contrast transcranial Doppler with Valsalva maneuver is a sensitive method for PFO detection, and percutaneous PFO closure should be considered.
Area of Science:
- Pediatric Neurology
- Cardiology
- Vascular Medicine
Background:
- Limited data exist on paradoxical embolism in unexplained pediatric ischemic cerebrovascular events.
- Patent foramen ovale (PFO) is a potential source of paradoxical embolism.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the significance of PFO in children experiencing ischemic cerebrovascular events of unknown etiology.
- To assess the utility of contrast transcranial Doppler (TCD) with Valsalva maneuver (VM) for PFO detection in this population.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study of pediatric patients with ischemic cerebrovascular events (2005-2007).
- Contrast TCD with VM performed for unexplained events.
- Percutaneous PFO closure offered for presumed paradoxical embolism.
Main Results:
- Eighteen pediatric patients (median age 11.5 years) included; 12 with stroke, 6 with TIA.
- PFO detected by TCD/VM in 4/6 stroke and 5/6 TIA patients with unexplained events.
- Nine patients underwent attempted percutaneous PFO closure.
Conclusions:
- PFO's role in unexplained pediatric ischemic cerebrovascular events may be underestimated.
- Contrast TCD with VM is a sensitive, noninvasive tool for PFO detection in children.
- Percutaneous PFO closure is a viable consideration for children with unexplained events and presumed paradoxical embolism.
Objectives:
To consider the role of patent foramen ovale (PFO) in ischemic cerebrovascular event of unknown cause in children.
Background:
Data regarding the possibility of paradoxical embolism in unexplained ischemic cerebrovascular event in children are lacking.
Methods:
Between January 2005 and March 2007, all consecutive children evaluated due to ischemic cerebrovascular event were included in the retrospective study. In addition to the standard diagnostic protocol, a contrast transcranial Doppler (TCD) with Valsalva maneuver (VM) was performed in patients with unexplained events. Percutaneous PFO closure was offered to all patients with ischemic cerebrovascular event of unknown cause and presumed paradoxical embolism.
Results:
Eighteen patients aged between 2 and 17 years (median 11.5 years) were included in the study: 12 patients suffered ischemic stroke and six with transient ischemic attack (TIA). In six patients, ischemic stroke was of unknown cause and contrast TCD with VM was positive in four of them. In addition, TCD study was positive in five patients evaluated because of TIA. Nine patients with presumed paradoxical embolism underwent an attempt at the percutaneous PFO closure.
Conclusions:
It appears that the role of PFO in ischemic cerebrovascular event of unknown cause in children may be underestimated. Contrast TCD with VM is a sensitive, noninvasive method for PFO detection, proved in our experience particularly suitable for children. In children with unexplained ischemic cerebrovascular event and presumed paradoxical embolism, percutaneous PFO closure should be considered.
Related Concept Videos
Cerebral Edema ll: Pathophysiology
Aneurysm II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Hemorrhagic Stroke ll: Pathophysiology
Increased Intracranial Pressure ll: Pathophysiology
Transient Ischemic Attack l: Introduction
Ischemic Stroke l: Introduction

