Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

A Procedure to Study Stress-Induced Relapse of Heroin Seeking after Punishment-Imposed Abstinence
Published on: March 23, 2022
No skin off my back: retribution deficits in psychopathic motives for punishment
Eyal Aharoni1, Lisa L Weintraub, Alan J Fridlund
1Department of Psychology, UC Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA. aharoni@psych.ucsb.edu
Abstract:
When deciding a criminal's punishment, people typically exhibit both retributive and consequentialist motives in their decision making, though retribution's role may be stronger. This study aimed to discern possible functions of retribution by examining a population predicted to be deficient in retributive drive. Participants who rated either high or low in psychopathic traits read stories about a homicide. These stories were designed to evoke both retribution and the consequentialist motive of behavior control by varying, respectively, criminal intent and likelihood of recidivism. The participants then recommended a length of confinement for the offender. Individuals high in psychopathic traits were uniquely insensitive to retributive cues, and they were particularly consequentialist in their punishment of criminal offenders. These results clarify aspects of psychopathic aggression and corroborate the hypothesis that retribution may stabilize cooperative behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Dark Triad and Person Perception
Punishment
Punishment can be positive or negative. Positive punishment involves adding an undesirable stimulus, such as scolding, to decrease a behavior. Negative punishment involves removing a desirable stimulus, such as taking away a favorite toy, to decrease behavior.
Antisocial Personality Disorder
Behavioral Characteristics and...
Secondary Motives: Affiliation Motivation and Aggression Motivation
The Stanford Prison Experiment
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

