Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Standardized Method for Measuring Collection Efficiency from Wipe-sampling of Trace Explosives
Published on: April 10, 2017
Effectiveness of contamination prevention procedures in a trace explosives laboratory
Matthew S Beardah1, Sean P Doyle, Charlotte E Hendey
1Forensic Explosives Laboratory, Defence Science and Technology Laboratory, Fort Halstead, Sevenoaks, Kent, TN14 7BP, United Kingdom. msbeardah@dstl.gov.uk
Abstract:
The effectiveness of a number of the explosives contamination prevention controls that are adopted within the Forensic Explosives Laboratory (FEL) principal trace laboratory has been scrutinised. Within the trace laboratory, rigorous procedures for processing forensic swab samples for traces of organic explosives are routinely adopted by forensic scientists. In order to demonstrate the effectiveness of these procedures, and the principle of separating the sample from the laboratory and the forensic scientist, explosives-free swab samples and appropriate controls have been processed, in accordance with trace laboratory procedures, in several explosives contaminated environments. In all cases, no explosives were detected in the post-processing samples, demonstrating that the contamination prevention procedures are effective, robust and fit-for-purpose.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Contaminants and Errors
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Lab
Solutions containing organic solvents, such as low-molecular-mass alcohols, esters, or ketones, enhance absorbances by increasing nebulizer...
Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy: Interference
Spectral interference occurs when signals from other elements or molecules overlap with the analyte signal, falsely elevating or masking the analyte's absorbance. This interference can be corrected using Zeeman,...
Atomic Emission Spectroscopy: Interference

