Related Experiment Videos
Strength of posterior composite repairs using different composite/bonding agent combinations
A D Puckett1, R Holder, J W O'Hara
1University of Mississippi, School of Dentistry, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Jackson 39216-4505.
Operative Dentistry
|July 1, 1991
Summary
Repairing posterior composite fillings is crucial as their use grows. Dentin bonding agents offer superior bond strength for posterior composite repairs compared to enamel bonding agents.
Area of Science:
- Dental Materials Science
- Restorative Dentistry
Background:
- Posterior composite restorations are increasingly used as an alternative to amalgam.
- The rising prevalence of composite use necessitates effective repair strategies for aged restorations.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the bond strength of repaired posterior composite restorations using various bonding agent/composite combinations.
- To compare the bond strength of different repair systems to aged posterior composite substrates.
Main Methods:
- Aged posterior composite substrates were prepared.
- Repairs were performed using different dentin bonding agent/composite pairs and enamel bonding agent/composite pairs.
- The bond strength of the repaired specimens was measured and compared.
Main Results:
- Dentin bonding agent/composite pairs demonstrated the highest bond strengths.
- The bond strength achieved with dentin bonding agents exceeded that of resin bonded to etched enamel.
- Enamel bonding agent/composite repairs yielded the lowest bond strengths, falling below resin/etched enamel bond strengths.
Conclusions:
- Dentin bonding agents are effective for repairing aged posterior composite restorations, providing superior bond strength.
- Enamel bonding agents are less suitable for posterior composite repairs, resulting in weaker bonds.
- The choice of bonding agent significantly impacts the success of posterior composite repair.