Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026
07:11
Treatment of Facial Deformities using 3D Planning and Printing of Patient-Specific Implants
Published on: May 23, 2020
[Post-academic dental specialties 17. Implant-retained craniofacial prostheses]
A Visser1, G M Raghoebar, R P van Oort
1Afdeling Kaakchirurgie van het Universitair Medisch Centrum Groningen. a.visser@kchir.umcg.nl
Nederlands Tijdschrift Voor Tandheelkunde
|December 7, 2007
Summary
This study evaluated implant-retained craniofacial prostheses over two decades. Implant survival rates were high, but material degradation and fit issues necessitated prosthesis replacement.
Area of Science:
- Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
- Biomaterials Science
- Prosthodontics
Context:
- Craniofacial prostheses are crucial for restoring form and function.
- Endosseous implants provide stable support for these complex devices.
- Long-term aftercare data for implant-retained prostheses is essential for clinical practice.
Purpose:
- To analyze the surgical and prosthetic aftercare of implant-retained craniofacial prostheses.
- To determine implant survival rates in irradiated and non-irradiated bone.
- To identify common reasons for the replacement of craniofacial prostheses.
Summary:
- A two-decade retrospective analysis of patients with implant-retained craniofacial prostheses was conducted.
- Implant survival rates were 95.2% in non-irradiated bone and 78.8% in irradiated bone.
- Prosthesis replacement was frequently due to silicone discoloration, clip detachment, material rupture, and poor fit.
Impact:
- Provides valuable insights into the long-term outcomes of implant-supported craniofacial rehabilitation.
- Highlights the challenges associated with material durability and prosthesis maintenance.
- Informs clinical decision-making and material selection for improved patient longevity and satisfaction.