Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

10:12
Three Dimensional Vestibular Ocular Reflex Testing Using a Six Degrees of Freedom Motion Platform
Published on: May 23, 2013
Unilateral deafferentation and eye position misdirect the initial vestibulo-ocular reflex: a model-based study
Benjamin T Crane1, Junru Tian, Akira Ishiyama
1Department of Surgery (Division of Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery), University of California, Los Angeles 90095-7002, USA.
Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science
|December 7, 2007
Summary
Unilateral vestibular deafferentation (UVD) alters vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) axis direction, particularly during ipsilesional rotation. Canal nonlinearity and orientation, not eye position, explain this VOR axis error in UVD patients.
Area of Science:
- Neuroscience
- Vestibular System Research
- Ophthalmology
Background:
- The vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR) stabilizes gaze during head movements.
- VOR axis direction is influenced by both eye position and vestibular sensitivity.
- Unilateral vestibular deafferentation (UVD) disrupts normal vestibular function.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the interaction between orbital eye position and vestibular sensitivity in determining VOR axis direction in individuals with UVD.
- To quantify VOR axis deviations in response to transient head rotations in normal subjects and those with UVD.
Main Methods:
- Measured VOR direction and magnitude in response to high-acceleration yaw rotations.
- Assessed the effect of eye position using the tilt angle ratio (TAR) for upward and downward targets.
- Compared responses between six normal subjects and five subjects with UVD.
Main Results:
- UVD subjects showed reduced VOR gain during ipsilesional rotation compared to contralesional rotation and normal controls.
- A significant initial forward VOR axis tilt was observed in UVD subjects during ipsilesional rotation.
- The tilt angle ratio (TAR) in UVD subjects indicated a compromise between Listing's Law and head-aligned VOR, suggesting canal nonlinearity and geometric orientation contribute to VOR error.
Conclusions:
- A vector-based model explains VOR axis tilt in UVD, attributing it to semicircular canal properties rather than eye position effects.
- Canal nonlinearity and geometric orientation are key factors in the observed VOR axis errors following UVD.
- Late visual pursuit synergy may influence VOR responses in UVD subjects between 150-200 ms post-rotation.

