Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Directional benefit in simulated classroom environments.

Todd Ricketts1, Jason Galster, Anne Marie Tharpe

  • 1Dan Maddox Hearing Aid Research Laboratory, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Department of Hearing and Speech Sciences, 1215 21st Avenue South, Room 8310, Medical Center East, South Tower, Nashville, TN 37232-8242, USA. todd.a.ricketts@vanderbilt.edu

American Journal of Audiology
|December 7, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Remote Programming of Adult and Pediatric Cochlear Implant Recipients: Clinical Trial Results.

Otology & neurotology open·2025
Same author

Hearing Aid Service Models, Technology, and Patient Outcomes: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA otolaryngology-- head & neck surgery·2025
Same author

Evaluating the Safety and Usability of an Over-the-Counter Medical Device for Adults With Mild to Moderate Hearing Loss: Formative and Summative Usability Testing.

JMIR human factors·2025
Same author

Validation of the Vanderbilt Classroom Listening Assessment Short Survey for Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Ear and hearing·2024
Same author

Relationships Between Hearing-Related and Health-Related Variables in Academic Progress of Children With Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2024
Same author

Remote Microphone Systems for Autistic and Nonautistic Youth: Effects on Audiovisual Task Engagement.

Ear and hearing·2024
Same journal

Cochlear Implantation in Children Without a Hearing Aid Trial: A Case Series of 22 Patients.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Associations Between Self-Reported Workload and Measures of Speech Recognition in Adults Across the Lifespan.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Emotion-Specific Associations Between Perceived Sound Quality and Auditory Emotion Recognition in Children With Cochlear Implants.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Development and Validation of Modified Basic English Lexicon Sentences for Use With a Pediatric Population.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Risk of Noise-Induced Hearing Loss: A Survey of Texas Shop Teachers.

American journal of audiology·2026
Same journal

Auditory Spatial Processing in Patients With Vestibular Migraine.

American journal of audiology·2026
See all related articles

Children using directional hearing aids performed better when sounds came from the front. However, directional microphones may not be ideal in all classroom situations, especially when sounds come from multiple directions.

Area of Science:

  • Audiology
  • Speech-Language Pathology
  • Pediatric Hearing

Background:

  • Classroom acoustics present significant challenges for children with hearing impairments.
  • Directional microphone technology in hearing aids aims to improve speech recognition in noise.
  • Understanding microphone mode performance in pediatric hearing aid users is crucial for optimal outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate speech recognition and subjective ratings of directional versus omnidirectional microphone modes.
  • To assess performance across diverse simulated classroom acoustic conditions.

Main Methods:

  • Speech recognition was assessed in 26 children (aged 10-17 years).
  • Testing occurred in up to 8 simulated listening environments.
  • Both directional and omnidirectional microphone modes were compared.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • A significant benefit of directional mode was observed when sound sources were in front.
  • A performance decrement occurred when sound sources were behind the participants.
  • Directional processing limited to low frequencies eliminated both advantages and disadvantages.

Conclusions:

  • Directional hearing aid modes are beneficial in some noisy school environments.
  • Optimal use of directional mode requires sound sources to be in the front hemisphere.
  • Appropriate microphone mode switching is essential for school-aged children using hearing aids.