Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Cost-effectiveness analysis in colorectal cancer using a semi-Markov model
Christel Castelli1, Christophe Combescure, Yohann Foucher
1Institut Universitaire de Recherche Clinique, Laboratoire de Biostatistique, 641 av. du doyen Gaston Giraud, 34093 Montpellier, France. Castelli@iurc.montp.inserm.fr
This study introduces a novel semi-Markov model to assess total healthcare costs by tracking patient health status changes. The analysis found no significant cost-effectiveness difference between colorectal cancer follow-up strategies.
Area of Science:
- Health economics
- Biostatistics
- Oncology
Background:
- Traditional cost-effectiveness models often simplify patient health dynamics.
- There is a need for methods that incorporate dynamic health status changes into cost assessments.
- Colorectal cancer follow-up strategies require robust cost-effectiveness evaluation.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and apply an original semi-Markov model for assessing total patient costs.
- To incorporate patient health status dynamics and covariate effects into cost modeling.
- To perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing two colorectal cancer follow-up strategies.
Main Methods:
- Developed a semi-Markov model with explicitly defined sojourn time distributions (Weibull).
- Incorporated covariates into the hazard function for each transition.
- Derived a cumulative cost function from a regression model and used bootstrap for Incremental Net Benefit (INB) estimation.
Main Results:
- The model enabled estimation of mean cost per patient and identification of direct cost determinants.
- Mean survival differed between standard (4.35 years) and moderate (4.12 years) follow-up groups.
- Mean costs varied significantly based on follow-up strategy and Dukes stage.
Conclusions:
- The proposed semi-Markov model effectively integrates health status dynamics into cost analysis.
- Neither of the compared colorectal cancer follow-up strategies demonstrated superior cost-effectiveness.
- Follow-up strategy and cancer stage are significant determinants of direct medical costs.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Survival Analysis
Comparing the Survival Analysis of Two or More Groups
Kaplan-Meier Approach
