Subclassification of small for gestational age children with persistent short stature: growth patterns and response
Wietske Ester1, Ellen Bannink, Marije van Dijk
1Department of Pediatrics, Division of Endocrinology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children's Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. w.ester@erasmusmc.nl
Insights
Subclassifying short small for gestational age (SGA) children by birth measurements reveals distinct patterns in development and growth. These subgroups show varied gestation, delivery, and postnatal growth, but similar growth hormone treatment responses.
Area of Science:
- Pediatrics
- Endocrinology
- Neonatology
Background:
- Small for gestational age (SGA) is a common condition with varied etiologies and growth outcomes.
- Understanding subgroups within SGA can refine clinical management and research.
- Birth anthropometrics offer a potential method for subclassification.
Purpose of the Study:
- To determine if subclassification of short SGA children based on birth anthropometrics (length, weight, head circumference) can differentiate patterns in gestation, delivery, postnatal growth, and response to growth hormone (GH) treatment.
- To analyze parental height and target height differences among these subgroups.
Main Methods:
- 201 short SGA children were classified into three groups: SGA(L), SGA(L+W), and SGA(L+W+HC) based on birth length, weight, and head circumference SDS (≤ -2.00).
- Data collected included gestational age, delivery method, anthropometrics at birth and up to 3 years, GH treatment response, and parental height.
Main Results:
- SGA(L+W+HC) children had the shortest gestational age and highest C-section rate. SGA(L+W) children showed the highest rate of gestational hypertension.
- SGA(L+W+HC) children were born shorter but exhibited greater height and head circumference growth in the first three years, though head circumference remained smaller at age 3.
- No significant differences were observed in growth response to GH treatment across the subgroups. SGA(L) children had shorter parental and target heights.
Conclusions:
- Subclassification of short SGA children using birth anthropometrics is a valuable method for identifying distinct patterns in gestation, delivery, and postnatal growth.
- While subgroups differ in early development, their response to growth hormone treatment is comparable.
- This subclassification aids in a more nuanced understanding and investigation of SGA children.
Aim:
We determined whether subclassification of short small for gestational age (SGA) children according to birth anthropometrics could delineate different patterns in gestation, delivery, postnatal growth, response to growth hormone (GH) treatment and parental height.
Methods:
201 short SGA children were divided into three groups, SGA(L), SGA(L+W) and SGA(L+W+HC), according to birth length (L), weight (W) and head circumference (HC) < or =-2.00 standard deviation score (SDS).
Results:
SGA(L+W+HC) children were born after the shortest gestational age and more often by caesarean section than SGA(L) children (36.3 vs. 38.1 weeks, 68.4 vs. 24.4%). SGA(L+W) children had an intermediate pattern and experienced most gestational hypertension (p = 0.01). At birth, SGA(L+W+HC) children were shorter than SGA(L) or SGA(L+W) (-4.12 vs. -2.67 and -3.72 SDS, p < or = 0.001). During the first 3 years of life, SGA(L+W+HC) children exhibited an increased growth in height (0.98 SDS) and HC (1.28 SDS) than SGA(L) (height, -0.06 SDS; HC, -0.30 SDS) and SGA(L+W) (height, 0.62 SDS; HC, -0.31 SDS). However, HC SDS remained smaller for SGA(L+W+HC) than the other groups at age 3. The groups did not differ in growth response during GH treatment. SGA(L) children tended to have shorter parents and target height than SGA(L+W+HC) children.
Conclusions:
Our study shows that subclassification of short SGA children might be a useful method for investigating SGA children as the subgroups revealed a different gestation, delivery and postnatal growth pattern. Response to GH treatment was not different between the groups.
Related Concept Videos
Nature and Nurture
Signs of Puberty
Polygenic Traits


