Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 9, 2026

Computation of Atmospheric Concentrations of Molecular Clusters from ab initio Thermochemistry
Published on: April 8, 2020
Complete basis set limit of Ab initio binding energies and geometrical parameters for various typical types of
Seung Kyu Min1, Eun Cheol Lee, Han Myoung Lee
1Department of Chemistry, Center for Superfunctional Materials, Pohang University of Science and Technology, San 31, Hyojadong, Namgu, Pohang 790-784, Korea.
Abstract:
Using basis-set extrapolation schemes for a given data set, we evaluated the binding energies and geometries at the complete basis set (CBS) limit at the levels of the second order Møller-Plesset perturbation theory (MP2) and the coupled cluster theory with singles, doubles, and perturbative triples excitations [CCSD(T)]. The systems include the hydrogen bonding (water dimer), aromatic interaction (benzene dimer), pi-H interaction (benzene-water), cation-water, anion-water, pi-cation interaction (cation-benzene), and pi-anion interaction (anion-triazine). One extrapolation method is to exploit both BSSE-corrected and BSSE-uncorrected binding energies for the aug-cc-pVNZ (N = 2, 3, 4, ...) basis set in consideration that both binding energies give the same CBS limit (CBS(B)). Another CBS limit (CBS(C)) is to use the commonly known extrapolation approach to exploit that the electron correlation energy is proportional to N(-3). Since both methods are complementary, they are useful for estimating the errors and trend of the asymptotic values. There is no significant difference between both methods. Overall, the values of CBS(C) are found to be robust because of their consistency. However, for small N (in particular, for N = 2, 3), CBS(N)(B) is found to be slightly better for water-water interactions and cation-water and cation-benzene interactions, whereas CBS(N)(C) is found to be more reliable for bezene-water and anion-water interactions. We also note that the MP2 CBS limit value based on N = 2 and 3 combined with the difference between CCSD(T) and MP2 at N = 2 would be exploited to obtain a CCSD(T)/CBS value for aromatic-aromatic interactions and anion-pi interactions, but not for cationic complexes.
More Related Videos
08:54Vibrational Spectra of a N719-Chromophore/Titania Interface from Empirical-Potential Molecular-Dynamics Simulation, Solvated by a Room Temperature Ionic Liquid
Published on: January 25, 2020
14:44Structure and Coordination Determination of Peptide-metal Complexes Using 1D and 2D 1H NMR
Published on: December 16, 2013
Related Concept Videos
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Valence Bond Theory
Valence Bond Theory
Complexation Equilibria: Overview
The equilibrium constant of the complexation reaction is represented as the formation constant...
Crystal Field Theory - Tetrahedral and Square Planar Complexes
Crystal field theory (CFT) is applicable to molecules in geometries other than octahedral. In octahedral complexes, the lobes of the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals point directly at the ligands. For tetrahedral complexes, the d orbitals remain in place, but with only four ligands located between the axes. None of the orbitals points directly at the tetrahedral ligands. However, the dx2−y2 and dz2 orbitals (along the Cartesian axes) overlap with the ligands less than the dxy,...