Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Regulatory false positives: true, false, or uncertain?

Louis Anthony Cox

    Risk Analysis : an Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis
    |December 14, 2007
    PubMed
    Summary
    This summary is machine-generated.

    Related Concept Videos

    You might also read

    Related Articles

    Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

    Sort by
    Same author

    Reducing Risk Misinformation and Miscommunication: A Sheaf-Theoretic Perspective.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
    Same author

    Necessary conditions for valid causal inference from observational data.

    Critical reviews in toxicology·2026
    Same author

    Integrating Fragmented Risk Knowledge: Sheaf Theory for Risk Analysts.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
    Same author

    Combining Diverse Expert Opinions in Risk Analysis Using Relative Causal Knowledge.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
    Same author

    Improving the design of epidemiology studies that use biomonitoring for exposure assessment: a SciPinion panel recommendation.

    BMC medical research methodology·2026
    Same author

    Living with risk, then and now: A dual review of Cam Grey's Living with Risk in the Late Roman World and of current AI-assisted book reviewing.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2025
    Same journal

    Competition and Collaboration in the AI Race: Country-LevelDirectional Evidence for Risk Monitoring and Policy.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
    Same journal

    Cyber Resilience: Management With Cybersecurity Controls.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
    Same journal

    Jack Fowle: Combining Values, Experience, and Teamwork to Improve Risk Analysis.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
    Same journal

    A Hybrid FMEA-AHP Framework for Risk Prioritization in Nontransparent Artificial Intelligence Systems.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
    Same journal

    Trust-Building Communication for Extreme Heat Preparedness.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
    Same journal

    Spring Broken: A Risk Analysis of Fatal and Nonfatal Traffic Injuries in Florida.

    Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis·2026
    See all related articles

    The precautionary principle

    Area of Science:

    • Risk Assessment
    • Environmental Policy
    • Regulatory Science

    Background:

    • The precautionary principle aims to manage uncertain risks to health and the environment.
    • Empirical evaluation of the precautionary principle's performance is crucial for effective policy.
    • Hansen et al. (2007) assessed the principle's historical application, identifying few 'false positives'.

    Discussion:

    • This analysis critiques Hansen et al.'s methodology for evaluating 'false positives' under the precautionary principle.
    • Questionable criteria were used, potentially misclassifying uncertain risks as 'real' without demonstrated harm.
    • Examples include using conservative assumptions and ambiguous associations as evidence of risk.

    Key Insights:

    • The study suggests Hansen et al.'s criteria may inflate the perceived reality of risks.

    Related Experiment Videos

  • This approach could lead to the classification of nonexistent or unknown risks as 'real'.
  • A more rigorous definition of 'false positive' is needed for accurate assessment of the precautionary principle.

    • Outlook:

    • Refining the evaluation of regulatory false positives is essential for evidence-based environmental and health policies.
    • Future research should focus on robust methodologies for assessing uncertain risks.
    • Accurate assessment supports the responsible application of the precautionary principle.