Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

How do predators cope with chemically defended foods?

John I Glendinning1

  • 1Department of Biological Sciences, Barnard College, Columbia University, 3009 Broadway, New York, New York 10027, USA. jglendinning@barnard.edu

The Biological Bulletin
|December 18, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The use (and misuse) of nonnutritive sweeteners in studies of sugar appetite and reward in rodents.

Physiology & behavior·2026
Same author

Mice Condition Cephalic Insulin Responses to the Flavor of Different Laboratory Chows.

Nutrients·2025
Same author

Fighting Fire with Fire: Impact of Sugary Diets on Metabolically Deranged Mice.

Nutrients·2025
Same author

Mice Condition Cephalic-Phase Insulin Release to Flavors Associated with Postoral Actions of Concentrated Glucose.

Nutrients·2024
Same author

Mice learn to identify and discriminate sugar solutions based on odor cues.

Chemical senses·2024
Same author

Individual differences in cephalic-phase insulin response are stable over time and predict glucose tolerance in mice.

Physiology & behavior·2024
Same journal

About the Cover.

The Biological bulletin·2026
Same journal

How Does Local Temperature Shape Thermal Tolerance? A Test Using Congeneric Snails on Tropical Rocky Shores.

The Biological bulletin·2026
Same journal

The Cnidarian Bcl-2 Family and Apoptosis: Evidence for Evolutionary Diversity and Involvement in the Onset of Symbiosis.

The Biological bulletin·2026
Same journal

High Mortality and Reduced Pup Production in Eared Seals Following the 2023 Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Outbreak in Patagonia.

The Biological bulletin·2026
Same journal

Regeneration and Caudal Segmentation in <i>Phragmatopoma californica</i> (Annelida: Sabellariidae).

The Biological bulletin·2026
Same journal

A Redescription and Characterization of the Transcriptome of the Sea Anemone <i>Edwardsia elegans</i> (Verrill).

The Biological bulletin·2026
See all related articles

Predators use chemosensory detection to cope with defensive chemicals in prey. However, they have mixed success overcoming these defenses, sometimes rejecting safe prey or eating toxic prey.

Area of Science:

  • Ecology
  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Biochemistry

Background:

  • Prey species utilize chemical defenses to deter predators, making their tissues noxious or toxic.
  • Predators must develop strategies to detect, avoid, or tolerate these chemical defenses to consume prey.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To explore how predators cope with chemical defenses in their diet.
  • To review predator chemosensory mechanisms for detecting defensive chemicals.
  • To examine the effectiveness of predator strategies against prey chemical defenses.

Main Methods:

  • Review of chemosensory mechanisms in predators for detecting defensive chemicals.
  • Analysis of predator avoidance and tolerance strategies for chemical defenses.
  • Evaluation of the success rate of free-ranging predators in overcoming prey chemical defenses.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Predators possess chemosensory mechanisms to detect defensive chemicals in prey.
  • Predators employ diverse strategies including avoidance and tolerance to manage chemical defenses.
  • Evidence shows predators have variable success, sometimes rejecting palatable prey or consuming toxic prey.

Conclusions:

  • Predator success in overcoming prey chemical defenses is inconsistent.
  • Predator-prey chemical interactions involve complex sensory and behavioral adaptations.
  • Further research is needed to fully understand the dynamics of chemical defense efficacy.