Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Sequential processing of cues in memory-based multiattribute decisions.

Arndt Bröder1, Wolfgang Gaissmaier

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Bonn, Bonn, Germany. broeder@uni-bonn.de

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|December 20, 2007
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Representing objects and features in long-term memory: A case for direct feature-feature binding.

Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition·2026
Same author

Communicating Time-to-Event Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials: A Randomized Experiment among General Practitioners.

Medical decision making : an international journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making·2026
Same author

Limited cue integration in metacognitive control decisions.

Memory & cognition·2026
Same author

Mending metacognitive illusions in JOLs: when neither cognitive nor metacognitive feedback is effective.

Memory (Hove, England)·2026
Same author

Nailing Down the Perceptual Explanation of the Date/Delay Effect in Temporal Discounting.

Experimental psychology·2026
Same author

A combinatorial set of 3,125 cartoon characters based on five attributes for research on categorization, judgment, decision-making, and memory with adults and children.

Behavior research methods·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Participants often use fast and frugal heuristics like "take the best" (TTB) for probabilistic inferences. This study

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Decision Science
  • Human Memory

Background:

  • Individuals frequently employ fast and frugal heuristics for probabilistic inferences from memory.
  • The "take the best" (TTB) heuristic, a prominent example, assumes a sequential search of cues.
  • Alternative models propose simultaneous global matching processes, differing in cognitive mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the cognitive processes underlying probabilistic inferences from long-term memory.
  • To provide empirical support for the assumption of sequential cue search in heuristics like TTB.
  • To analyze response times (RTs) to differentiate between sequential and simultaneous decision-making models.

Main Methods:

  • Reanalysis of response times (RTs) from six experiments (total N=497).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Classification of decision strategies based on observed outcomes.
  • Statistical analysis of RT patterns in relation to the number of cues searched.
  • Main Results:

    • Decision times increased monotonically with the number of cues searched when TTB was indicated.
    • RT patterns consistently aligned with outcome-based strategy classifications.
    • Evidence supports the sequential search assumption inherent in TTB.

    Conclusions:

    • Findings support the cognitive process of sequential search in fast and frugal heuristics.
    • Response time data serve as a valid measure for inferring decision strategies.
    • The study validates both outcome-based strategy classifications and RT measures.