Search research articles

Search research articles

Related Experiment Videos

Methodological variables in choral reading.

Meredith A Poore¹, Sarah Hargus Ferguson

¹Department of Speech-Language-Hearing: Sciences and Disorders, University of Kansas, Lawrence 66045-7555, USA. mpoore@ku.edu

Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics

|December 20, 2007

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Gender, pitch variability, speaking rate, and low-frequency modulation affect judgments of anger in clear speecha).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2026

Same author

Detection of synchronization of the voice source and vocal tract in connected speech.

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2025

Same author

Perceived Gender in Clear and Conversational Speech.

Language and speech·2025

Same author

Talker Differences in Perceived Emotion in Clear and Conversational Speech.

Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR·2025

Same author

The Costs (and Benefits?) of Effortful Listening for Older Adults: Insights from Simultaneous Electrophysiology, Pupillometry, and Memory.

Journal of cognitive neuroscience·2024

Same author

Within-talker and within-session stability of acoustic characteristics of conversational and clear speaking stylesa).

The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America·2024

Same journal

Analysis of an acoustic event in European Portuguese stop-rhotic clusters and implications for phonological acquisition.

Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2026

Same journal

The role of right hemisphere in second language processing: Insights from a case study.

Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2026

Same journal

Audiovisual speech perception in Brazilian Portuguese-speaking children with and without Speech Sound Disorder (SSD).

Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2026

Same journal

Maximising student engagement in learning clinical phonetics and phonology using creative approaches.

Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2026

Same journal

Application of team-based learning to support knowledge acquisition and retention of craniofacial content in a graduate speech-language pathology course: A pilot study.

Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2026

Same journal

Effects of language sampling context on complex syntax production of deaf and hard of hearing children.

Clinical linguistics & phonetics·2026

See all related articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Choral reading, where individuals read aloud together, reduces speech variability. Track reading, using a recording, is not a suitable substitute for choral reading in fluency studies.

Area of Science:

Speech and Language Pathology
Acoustic Phonetics
Psycholinguistics

Background:

Choral reading is a technique used to enhance speech fluency.
Understanding prosodic variability changes during choral reading is crucial for its application.
The method of eliciting choral reading may influence its effects on speech production.

Purpose of the Study:

To explore changes in prosodic variability during choral reading.
To investigate if different methods of eliciting choral reading affect these changes.
To compare choral reading with solo and track reading conditions.

Main Methods:

Ten adult participants read poetry, fiction, and textbook materials.
Reading conditions included solo, track (with a recording), and choral (with a live partner).

Related Experiment Videos

Measurements of fundamental frequency, amplitude, and vowel duration variability were analyzed.

Main Results:

Choral reading significantly decreased variability in fundamental frequency, amplitude, and vowel duration compared to solo reading.
Track reading showed decreased fundamental frequency variability but increased vowel duration variability, with more errors.
Reading material did not significantly impact prosodic features but affected error rates.

Conclusions:

Track reading is not an appropriate substitute for choral reading in fluency-evoking studies.
The type of text used can influence speech fluency in different reading conditions.
Findings have implications for understanding speech prosody manipulation and execution.