Cardiac device implantation in the United States from 1997 through 2004: a population-based analysis

Chunliu Zhan1, William B Baine, Artyom Sedrakyan

  • 1Center for Outcomes and Evidence, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD, USA. chunliu.zhan@ahrq.hhs.gov

Insights

Cardiac device implantations, including pacemakers and defibrillators, rose significantly from 1997-2004. While hospital stays shortened, costs increased, with outcomes tied to patient health, not hospital volume.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Health Services Research
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Cardiac device use is increasing, raising safety and effectiveness concerns.
  • Hospital administrative data provides insights into device implantation trends and outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Assess trends in cardiac device implantations (pacemaker, AICD, CRT-P, CRT-D) in the U.S. from 1997-2004.
  • Evaluate perioperative outcomes, patient characteristics, and hospital factors associated with these implantations.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized Healthcare Cost and Utilization Project Nationwide Inpatient Sample data (1997-2004).
  • Identified patients receiving pacemakers (PM), automatic cardioverter/defibrillators (AICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy pacemakers (CRT-P), or defibrillators (CRT-D) using ICD-9-CM codes.
  • Analyzed length of stay, charges, in-hospital mortality, and complication rates.

Main Results:

  • Implantations of AICDs and PMs increased by 60% and 19% respectively by 2004.
  • Cardiac resynchronization therapy devices (CRT-D, CRT-P) saw rapid adoption post-2001.
  • Length of stay decreased significantly (e.g., AICD halved), while charges nearly doubled.
  • In-hospital mortality and complication rates showed slight fluctuations, primarily linked to older age, comorbidities, and emergency admissions.

Conclusions:

  • Cardiac device implantations steadily increased between 1997 and 2004.
  • Significant reductions in length of stay were observed, accompanied by substantial increases in healthcare charges.
  • In-hospital adverse outcomes were mainly associated with patient frailty, not hospital volume.
Abstract