Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Contributing co-variables in clinical trials.

S C Bayne1, H O Heymann, J R Sturdevant

  • 1Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill 27599-7450.

American Journal of Dentistry
|October 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tribute to Dianne Rekow-Dental "Imagineer".

Journal of dental research·2023
Same author

Evolution of Aesthetic Dentistry.

Journal of dental research·2019
Same author

The Evolution of Dental Materials over the Past Century: Silver and Gold to Tooth Color and Beyond.

Journal of dental research·2019
Same author

Eighteen-month Clinical Study of Universal Adhesives in Noncarious Cervical Lesions.

Operative dentistry·2018
Same author

Clinical studies in restorative dentistry: New directions and new demands.

Dental materials : official publication of the Academy of Dental Materials·2017
Same author

What constitutes an ideal dental restorative material?

Advances in dental research·2013
Same journal

Surface hardness ratios and surface roughness of bulk-fill resin composites following different heating protocols.

American journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Effect of different surface treatments on the repair bond strength of flowable single-shade bulk-fill composites.

American journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Effect of pre-diagnostic stain removal on the detection of occlusal fissure caries: A laboratory study.

American journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

A randomized controlled clinical evaluation of anti-gingivitis and desensitizing efficacy of a newly developed toothpaste with zinc chloride and oriental herb extract.

American journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Agreement among tooth color measurement devices: An experimental comparison.

American journal of dentistry·2026
Same journal

Locally delivered simvastatin and rosuvastatin in the treatment of chronic periodontitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

American journal of dentistry·2026
See all related articles

Comparing Class V dental bonding requires understanding how patient age and intraoral location affect resin composite restoration retention. A proposed formula offers clinical longevity values for adhesive restorations.

Area of Science:

  • Dental Materials Science
  • Clinical Dentistry
  • Biostatistics

Background:

  • Accurate comparison of Class V dentinal bonding studies is hindered by variability.
  • Factors like intraoral location and patient age influence restoration longevity.
  • Standardized methods are needed to evaluate the clinical performance of adhesive restorations.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and classify the effects of intraoral location and patient age on Class V resin composite restoration retention.
  • To propose a novel mathematical approach for normalizing data and analyzing clinical longevity.
  • To establish a method for determining CL50 values for adhesive restorations.

Main Methods:

  • Critical classification of factors influencing restoration retention in Class V cavities.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Development of a mathematical formula for data normalization.
  • Application of Weibull analysis to assess clinical longevity.

    • Main Results:

    • Identified intraoral location and patient age as critical variables affecting restoration retention.
    • Proposed a normalization formula and Weibull analysis for evaluating adhesive restorations.
    • The methodology provides CL50 values for predicting clinical longevity.

    Conclusions:

    • Standardizing Class V dentinal bonding study comparisons requires accounting for patient age and intraoral site.
    • The proposed mathematical formula and Weibull analysis offer a robust method for assessing the clinical longevity of adhesive restorations.
    • CL50 values derived from this method can enhance predictability in dental practice.