Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Crossing Over01:34

Crossing Over

169.6K
Unlike mitosis, meiosis aims for genetic diversity in its creation of haploid gametes. Dividing germ cells first begin this process in prophase I, where each chromosome—replicated in S phase—is now composed of two sister chromatids (identical copies) joined centrally.
The homologous pairs of sister chromosomes—one from the maternal and one from the paternal genome—then begin to align alongside each other lengthwise, matching corresponding DNA positions in a process...
169.6K
Crossing Over01:30

Crossing Over

6.3K
Crossing over is the exchange of genetic information between homologous chromosomes during prophase I of meiosis I. Genetic recombination gives rise to allelic diversity in the newly formed daughter cells. In humans, crossing over produces genetically distinct haploid egg and sperm cells that undergo fertilization to produce unique offspring. Before cell division starts, the germ cell’s chromosome(s) undergo duplication in the S phase of the cell cycle. As the cells enter prophase I,...
6.3K
Contaminants and Errors01:16

Contaminants and Errors

354
Effective sample preparation is crucial for accurate and reliable laboratory analysis. During this process, two significant sources of error can arise: concentration bias from improper sample splitting and contamination caused by methods used to reduce particle size, such as grinding or homogenization. Identifying and minimizing these potential errors is crucial to ensuring the validity of the analysis.
Another key consideration is determining the appropriate number of samples required to...
354
Monohybrid Crosses01:20

Monohybrid Crosses

238.8K
Overview
238.8K
Cross-Sectional Research01:50

Cross-Sectional Research

12.4K
In cross-sectional research, a researcher compares multiple segments of the population at the same time. If they were interested in people's dietary habits, the researcher might directly compare different groups of people by age. Instead of following a group of people for 20 years to see how their dietary habits changed from decade to decade, the researcher would study a group of 20-year-old individuals and compare them to a group of 30-year-old individuals and a group of 40-year-old...
12.4K
Dihybrid Crosses01:18

Dihybrid Crosses

80.9K
Overview
80.9K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multiomic analysis identifies glutaminolysis-dependent metabolic enhancement of immune memory utilised for vaccine development.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Rucaparib maintenance for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: interim overall survival, progression-free survival, and safety at 5 years of follow-up from the phase III ATHENA-MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45 study.

Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology·2025
Same author

The Lunar Environment Heliophysics X-ray Imager (LEXI) Mission.

Space science reviews·2024
Same author

Correction: An online parenting intervention to prevent affective disorders in high-risk adolescents: the PIPA trial protocol.

Trials·2022
Same author

An online parenting intervention to prevent affective disorders in high-risk adolescents: the PIPA trial protocol.

Trials·2022
Same author

The COV-ED Survey: exploring the impact of learning and teaching from home on parent/carers' and teachers' mental health and wellbeing during COVID-19 lockdown.

BMC public health·2022
Same journal

The Effect of Different Polishing Systems on the Surface Roughness and Color Changes of Monolithic Zirconia Crowns: A Comparison of Additive and Subtractive Manufacturing.

The International journal of prosthodontics·2026
Same journal

Retention and Wear Performance of Locator Attachments Under Cyclic Loading: An In Vitro Study.

The International journal of prosthodontics·2026
Same journal

Use and Interpretation of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Randomized Controlled Trials in Prosthodontics.

The International journal of prosthodontics·2026
Same journal

Influence of Implant Angulation on the Accuracy of Complete Arch Digital Scans with Intraoral Photogrammetry.

The International journal of prosthodontics·2026
Same journal

Influence of Virtual Articulator Programming on the Occlusal Contact Pattern in CAD/CAM Crowns: The Role of Jaw Motion Tracking Data.

The International journal of prosthodontics·2026
Same journal

Clinical Performance, Esthetics, and Patient-Rated Outcomes of Porcelain-Fused-to-Metal Fixed Partial Dentures with Cobalt-chromium and Gold-alloy Frameworks: A 5-to-7 Year Retrospective Study.

The International journal of prosthodontics·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
13:39

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

18.3K

Cross-contamination control in prosthodontic practice.

C Connor1

  • 1University College Dental Hospital, London.

The International Journal of Prosthodontics
|July 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Prosthodontic patients pose infection risks. This review details cross-contamination control measures for removable prosthodontics, covering patient evaluation, protection, and asepsis.

More Related Videos

Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae
10:20

Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae

Published on: July 10, 2015

16.4K
V3 Stain-free Workflow for a Practical, Convenient, and Reliable Total Protein Loading Control in Western Blotting
11:33

V3 Stain-free Workflow for a Practical, Convenient, and Reliable Total Protein Loading Control in Western Blotting

Published on: December 30, 2013

23.3K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jan 25, 2026

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory
13:39

Cell Culture Techniques and Practices to Avoid Contamination by Fungi and Bacteria in the Research Cell Culture Laboratory

Published on: July 7, 2023

18.3K
Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae
10:20

Quantification of Heavy Metals and Other Inorganic Contaminants on the Productivity of Microalgae

Published on: July 10, 2015

16.4K
V3 Stain-free Workflow for a Practical, Convenient, and Reliable Total Protein Loading Control in Western Blotting
11:33

V3 Stain-free Workflow for a Practical, Convenient, and Reliable Total Protein Loading Control in Western Blotting

Published on: December 30, 2013

23.3K

Area of Science:

  • Dentistry
  • Infectious Disease Control

Background:

  • Prosthodontic patients represent a high-risk group for infectious disease transmission and acquisition.
  • There is a growing recognition of the importance of cross-infection control in prosthodontic practice.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review cross-infection control measures pertinent to removable prosthodontic practice.
  • To highlight previously overlooked transmission routes and necessary precautions.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review focusing on cross-contamination control in prosthodontics.
  • Categorization of control measures into specific practice areas.

Main Results:

  • Identified key areas for infection control: patient evaluation, personal protection, instrument/equipment decontamination, clinical techniques, impression handling, and laboratory asepsis.
  • Emphasized the need for comprehensive strategies to mitigate infection risks.

Conclusions:

  • Implementing robust cross-infection control protocols is crucial in removable prosthodontics.
  • Aseptic techniques across all stages of prosthodontic care are essential for patient and practitioner safety.