Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The Periotest method for determining implant success.

D E Van Scotter1, C J Wilson

  • 1Department of Periodontics, Marquette University, Milwaukee.

The Journal of Oral Implantology
|January 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary

Current methods for determining dental implant stability are unreliable. This study introduces the Periotest method as a predictable and reproducible alternative for assessing implant success.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Motor learning without physical practice: The effects of combined action observation and motor imagery practice on cup-stacking speed.

Psychology of sport and exercise·2023
Same author

A Multi-Disciplinary Approach for the Management of Prosthetic Joint Infections: An Australian Perspective.

Malaysian orthopaedic journal·2022
Same author

Predicting responses to inhibitory synaptic input in substantia nigra pars reticulata neurons.

Journal of neurophysiology·2018
Same author

The ionic mechanism of membrane potential oscillations and membrane resonance in striatal LTS interneurons.

Journal of neurophysiology·2016
Same author

Long-term effects of very low-carbohydrate and high-carbohydrate weight-loss diets on psychological health in obese adults with type 2 diabetes: randomized controlled trial.

Journal of internal medicine·2016
Same author

Sun-related behaviours among young Australians with Asian ethnic background: differences according to sociocultural norms and skin tone perceptions.

European journal of cancer care·2014

Area of Science:

  • Dental Implantology
  • Biomaterials Science
  • Prosthodontics

Background:

  • Assessing dental implant stability is crucial for long-term success.
  • Existing methods for evaluating implant stability present significant limitations and unpredictability.
  • Clinical decisions regarding implant prognosis are often based on unreliable stability assessments.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To demonstrate the unpredictability of current dental implant stability determination methods.
  • To critically analyze the limitations of established techniques for assessing implant success.
  • To propose the Periotest method as a superior alternative for evaluating implant stability.

Main Methods:

  • Review and critique of existing clinical techniques for implant stability assessment.
  • Introduction and description of the Periotest method.
  • Discussion of the Periotest method's applicability in routine clinical practice.

Main Results:

  • Current methods for determining implant stability lack predictability and reproducibility.
  • The Periotest method offers a reliable and consistent approach to assessing implant stability.
  • The Periotest method addresses the shortcomings of traditional assessment techniques.

Conclusions:

  • The Periotest method provides a reliable and reproducible means for determining dental implant stability.
  • Clinicians should consider adopting the Periotest method for more accurate implant success evaluations.
  • Improved methods for stability assessment can enhance patient outcomes in implant dentistry.

Related Experiment Videos