Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

QSARs for selected aliphatic and aromatic amines.

T W Schultz1, T S Wilke, S E Bryant

  • 1College of Veterinary Medicine, University of Tennessee, Knoxville 37901-1071.

The Science of the Total Environment
|December 1, 1991
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 2-tert-butylcyclohexyl propionate, CAS Registry Number 40702-13-4.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2019
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, hexyl butyrate, CAS Registry Number 2639-63-6.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2019
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, diphenyl ether, CAS Registry Number 101-84-8.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2019
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, methyl 2-nonenoate, CAS Registry Number 111-79-5.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2019
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, 3-methylpentyl 2-methylisocrotonate, CAS Registry Number 53082-58-9.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2019
Same author

RIFM fragrance ingredient safety assessment, linalyl anthranilate, CAS Registry Number 7149-26-0.

Food and chemical toxicology : an international journal published for the British Industrial Biological Research Association·2019

Toxicity of 24 amines was assessed using Tetrahymena pyriformis and Pimephales promelas assays. Quantitative structure-activity relationships (QSAR) models based on the octanol-water partition coefficient (log KOW) accurately predicted amine toxicity in both systems.

Area of Science:

  • Environmental Toxicology
  • Ecotoxicology
  • Chemical Risk Assessment

Background:

  • Amines are widely used industrial chemicals with potential environmental impacts.
  • Assessing the ecotoxicity of diverse amine structures is crucial for environmental safety.
  • Existing ecotoxicity data for amines can be variable, necessitating robust predictive models.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the relative aquatic toxicity of 24 diverse amines using standardized ecotoxicity assays.
  • To develop and validate quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models for predicting amine toxicity.
  • To compare the predictive power of QSAR models derived from Tetrahymena pyriformis and Pimephales promelas toxicity data.

Main Methods:

  • Static population growth impairment assay using Tetrahymena pyriformis (48-hour).

Related Experiment Videos

  • Flow-through mortality assay using Pimephales promelas (96-hour) with literature data.
  • Regression analysis of toxicity data (log IGC50(-1), log LC50(-1)) against hydrophobicity (log KOW).
  • Development of QSAR models: log IGC50(-1) = 0.72(log KOW) - 1.64 and log LC50(-1) = 0.80(log KOW) - 1.80.
  • Main Results:

    • Toxicity and hydrophobicity of the tested amines varied over five orders of magnitude.
    • QSAR models demonstrated high predictive accuracy for Tetrahymena (r² = 0.92) and Pimephales (r² = 0.96) toxicity.
    • A strong correlation (r² = 0.93) was observed when comparing toxicity predictions between the two species, with a slope of approximately one.

    Conclusions:

    • The octanol-water partition coefficient (log KOW) is a significant predictor of amine aquatic toxicity.
    • QSAR models developed in this study provide reliable tools for estimating the ecotoxicity of amines.
    • The Tetrahymena pyriformis assay is a suitable alternative for predicting Pimephales promelas toxicity, facilitating broader ecotoxicological assessments.