Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Universal Molecular Retention with 11-Fold Expansion Microscopy
Published on: October 6, 2023
Magnification labels for stand magnifiers: always misleading and usually unachievable
William L Brown1, Dennis W Siemsen
1Mayo Clinic, Department of Ophthalmology, Division of Optometry, Rochester, MN 55905, USA. brown.william2@mayo.edu
Background:
Stand magnifiers (SMs) are traditionally labeled with F/4 or (F/4) + 1 magnification. This study addresses whether SMs are configured so that the assumptions associated with the labeled magnification can be realized.
Methods:
Three catalogs were examined to obtain the type of magnification label used for each of 66 different SMs. Image locations were acquired from published tables compiled by independent investigators when available. Otherwise, they were taken from manufacturer-provided information in the catalogs. The image location was used to determine how many magnifiers could be used in a manner that fulfills the assumptions underlying the labeled magnification.
Results:
For F/4 magnification, the page is assumed to be at the focal point of the SM and the image at infinity. No SMs met this condition. (F/4) + 1 magnification assumes the magnifier is close to the eye and the image is at 25 cm. Only 18% of the SMs have a 25 cm image distance.
Conclusion:
Most SMs do not have image locations that meet the conditions underlying the marked magnification. The current labeling system is inaccurate, misleading, and inefficient for clinicians. Magnification labels on SMs should be replaced with markings that include equivalent power, enlargement ratio, and image location.
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Biological Samples with Optical Microscopy
In optical microscopy, the specimen to be viewed is placed on a glass slide and clipped on the stage...
Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors
Overview of Microscopy Techniques
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments
Overview of Electron Microscopy
Super-resolution Fluorescence Microscopy

