Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Evaluation of a Point-of-Care Testing Analyzer for Measuring Peripheral Blood Leukocytes
Published on: March 22, 2022
Comparing two medical tests when results of reference standard are unavailable for those negative via both tests
1CDRH, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Maryland 20850, USA. Marina.Kondratovich@fda.hhs.gov
Abstract:
In studies for comparing the diagnostic accuracy of two qualitative tests, very often the reference standard to confirm the disease status is not applied to all study subjects. We considered a situation when all subjects with a positive result by at least one of the tests had a verified disease status and none of the subjects with both tests negative results had a verification of disease status. In this paper, we discuss whether the information about the ratio of true positive rates and the ratio of false positive rates of two qualitative tests, T(New) and T(Old), is sufficient to draw a conclusion about effectiveness of the T(New). We show that if there is a statistically significant increase in true positive rates and the increase in true positive rates is statistically larger than increase in false positive rates, then a conclusion about effectiveness of test T(New) can be made and this does not require application of the reference standard to the subjects with negative results by both tests. An application of ratio of true positive rates and ratio of false positive rates to post-market studies is also presented.
More Related Videos
06:16Signal Acquisition, Score Interpretation, and Economics of a Non-Invasive Point-of-Care Test for Coronary Artery Disease
Published on: August 9, 2024
07:52Detection of Antibodies That Neutralize the Cellular Uptake of Enzyme Replacement Therapies with a Cell-based Assay
Published on: September 10, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predicted Value
Sensitivity is the...
Comparison Tests
Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test for Matched Pairs
Multiple Comparison Tests
It would be easy to compare two samples using a significance alpha level of 0.05. In other words, there is only one sample pair to be compared. However, it would be difficult to identify a significantly different sample if the number...
Comparing Experimental Results: Student's t-Test
Bioequivalence Data: Statistical Interpretation