Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Knowing What Counts: Unbiased Stereology in the Non-human Primate Brain
Published on: May 14, 2009
The proportionator: unbiased stereological estimation using biased automatic image analysis and non-uniform
J E Gardi1, J R Nyengaard, H J G Gundersen
1Stereology and Electron Microscopy Research Laboratory and MIND Center, University of Aarhus, Ole Worms Allé 1185, Aarhus C, Denmark. Jonathan.Gardi@ki.au.dk
Abstract:
The proportionator is a novel and radically different approach to sampling with microscopes based on the well-known statistical theory (probability proportional to size-PPS sampling). It uses automatic image analysis, with a large range of options, to assign to every field of view in the section a weight proportional to some characteristic of the structure under study. A typical and very simple example, examined here, is the amount of color characteristic for the structure, marked with a stain with known properties. The color may be specific or not. In the recorded list of weights in all fields, the desired number of fields is sampled automatically with probability proportional to the weight and presented to the expert observer. Using any known stereological probe and estimator, the correct count in these fields leads to a simple, unbiased estimate of the total amount of structure in the sections examined, which in turn leads to any of the known stereological estimates including size distributions and spatial distributions. The unbiasedness is not a function of the assumed relation between the weight and the structure, which is in practice always a biased relation from a stereological (integral geometric) point of view. The efficiency of the proportionator depends, however, directly on this relation to be positive. The sampling and estimation procedure is simulated in sections with characteristics and various kinds of noises in possibly realistic ranges. In all cases examined, the proportionator is 2-15-fold more efficient than the common systematic, uniformly random sampling. The simulations also indicate that the lack of a simple predictor of the coefficient of error (CE) due to field-to-field variation is a more severe problem for uniform sampling strategies than anticipated. Because of its entirely different sampling strategy, based on known but non-uniform sampling probabilities, the proportionator for the first time allows the real CE at the section level to be automatically estimated (not just predicted), unbiased-for all estimators and at no extra cost to the user.
More Related Videos
08:19Stereological Estimation of Dopaminergic Neuron Number in the Mouse Substantia Nigra Using the Optical Fractionator and Standard Microscopy Equipment
Published on: September 1, 2017
07:55The Optical Fractionator Technique to Estimate Cell Numbers in a Rat Model of Electroconvulsive Therapy
Published on: July 9, 2017
Related Concept Videos
Sample Proportion and Population Proportion
Systematic Sampling Method
Systematic sampling is one of the simplest methods...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Stratified Sampling Method
To choose a stratified sample, divide the population into groups called strata and then take a...