Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Attention, intention and domain-specific processing.

Matthew Finkbeiner1, Kenneth I Forster

  • 1Macquarie Centre for Cognitive Science, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia. finkbeiner@maccs.mq.edu.au

Trends in Cognitive Sciences
|January 8, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spatial Attention and Saccade Preparation Both Independently Contribute to the Discrimination of Oblique Orientations.

Advances in cognitive psychology·2021
Same author

Examining speech motor planning difficulties in apraxia of speech and aphasia via the sequential production of phonetically similar words.

Cognitive neuropsychology·2020
Same author

Establishing the separable contributions of spatial attention and saccade preparation across tasks with varying acuity demands.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2020
Same author

Using evidence accumulation modeling to quantify the relative contributions of spatial attention and saccade preparation in perceptual tasks.

Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance·2020
Same author

Speech motor planning in the context of phonetically similar words: Evidence from apraxia of speech and aphasia.

Neuropsychologia·2019
Same author

Is the L2 lexicon different from the L1 lexicon? Evidence from novel word lexicalization.

Cognition·2016
Same journal

Multi-brain neurofeedback: what are we training for?

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

The developing vocal self.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Searching beyond decrements: Attentional guidance across the adult lifespan.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Looking into working memory through micro eye movements.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Timescapes of non-human experience.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
Same journal

Building word meanings from memories and predictions.

Trends in cognitive sciences·2026
See all related articles

Subliminal priming research shows nonconscious processes depend on attention. However, this attention influence occurs before domain-specific processing, preserving the autonomy of specialized cognitive systems.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Domain-specific processing mechanisms are traditionally viewed as autonomous.
  • Recent studies suggest nonconscious cognitive processes are influenced by attention.
  • This challenges the autonomy of domain-specific mechanisms.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To re-evaluate the autonomy of domain-specific processing mechanisms.
  • To investigate the role of attention in nonconscious cognitive processes.
  • To determine if attention modulates domain-specific processing directly.

Main Methods:

  • Subliminal priming paradigms.
  • Attention manipulation during nonconscious processing.
  • Analysis of cognitive process independence.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • Nonconscious cognitive processes were found to be modulated by attention.
  • This modulation by attention was localized to a pre-domain-specific stage.
  • Evidence did not support direct modulation of domain-specific processes by higher-level cognitive systems.

Conclusions:

  • Attention is a prerequisite for nonconscious processes.
  • The autonomy of domain-specific processing mechanisms remains supported.
  • Attention influences early processing stages, not specialized cognitive domains directly.