Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Automatic verification of ventricular stimulation: fusion management algorithm.

Matteo Bertini1, Mauro Biffi, Matteo Ziacchi

  • 1Institute of Cardiology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy. doc.matber@gmail.com

Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology : PACE
|January 10, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Early multimodal predictors of good neurological outcome in comatose patients after cardiac arrest: a prospective single-center cohort study.

Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology·2026
Same author

Impact of Sacubitril/Valsartan on Cardiac Autonomic Function Assessed Using Physiological Data from Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Cardiac resynchronization therapy in cancer patients with chemotherapy-induced cardiomyopathy: a mini review.

Heart failure reviews·2025
Same author

New-Onset Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation in Patients With Atrial Floating Dipole Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillators: A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison With Conventional Dual-Chamber Systems.

Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology·2025
Same author

Magnetic resonance-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices: an Italian perspective on the prevalence of mixed-brand systems over time.

Scientific reports·2024
Same author

Inappropriate therapies in modern implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: A propensity score-matched comparison between single- and dual-chamber discriminators in single-chamber devices THe sINGle lead Study (THINGS Study).

Heart rhythm·2024
Same journal

Dual Coronary Sinus Lead Strategy to Avoid Tricuspid Valve Traversal in Biventricular Pacing.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

A Case of Permanent Pacemaker Implantation via the Epicardial Approach Using the 3830 Lead in an 11-Day-Old Neonate (With Follow-Up of the Above Case).

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Cryoballoon Versus Radiofrequency Ablation for Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Tilt Test Duration in Suspected Vasovagal Syncope: Temporal Patterns and Diagnostic Yield in Patients From Central China.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Combined Leadless Pacing and Subcutaneous ICD Therapy in Long QT Syndromes.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
Same journal

Association of Anesthesia Modality With Procedural Parameters and Clinical Outcomes in PVI for Atrial Fibrillation.

Pacing and clinical electrophysiology : PACE·2026
See all related articles

This study found that a long atrioventricular (AV) interval improves the accuracy of an automatic fusion beat management algorithm in pacemakers. Optimizing AV programming enhances device safety and longevity by correctly identifying fusion beats.

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Device Technology

Background:

  • Ventricular stimulation requires safety and device longevity.
  • Fusion beats can interfere with evoked response detection, leading to unnecessary backup stimulation.
  • An automatic fusion beat management algorithm was evaluated in DDD/R pacemakers.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate an automatic fusion beat management algorithm.
  • To assess the algorithm's relationship with atrioventricular (AV) interval programming.
  • To determine optimal programming for pacemaker safety and efficiency.

Main Methods:

  • Analysis of 45 Holter registrations from patients with Insignia Ultra DR pacemakers.
  • Comparison of the Fusion Management Algorithm's fusion beat classification with physician visual inspection.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Categorization of fusions into loss of capture, true fusions, or captured beats.
  • Grouping patients based on long (>150 ms) versus short (<=150 ms) AV delay programming.

    • Main Results:

    • Fusion beats constituted 26% of total beats, with 65% paced beats.
    • The algorithm correctly identified loss of capture as fusion.
    • No unnecessary backup pulses were triggered by fusion beats.
    • Misclassification rates varied with AV delay; long AV delay significantly improved true fusion detection accuracy (P < 0.001).

    Conclusions:

    • Fusion management algorithm (FMA) performance is enhanced with a long AV interval or automatic search for intrinsic activity.
    • Programming the AV interval to promote intrinsic conduction does not impede FMA performance.
    • Optimized AV interval programming improves pacemaker safety and device longevity.