Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Do capuchin monkeys use weight to select hammer tools?

Cornelia Schrauf1, Ludwig Huber, Elisabetta Visalberghi

  • 1Department for Neurobiology and Cognition Research, University of Vienna, Althanstrasse 14, 1090, Vienna, Austria. conny.schrauf@chello.at

Animal Cognition
|January 10, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Animal empathy reconsidered: a multidimensional profile account.

Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society·2026
Same author

Bimanual Coordination and Right-Hand Bias in Extractive Foraging by Wild Sapajus libidinosus.

American journal of primatology·2026
Same author

Pupil size changes reveal that dogs are sensitive to the social conventions behind human gestures.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Popperian Dogs-Practical Rationality and Inferential Reasoning in Dogs.

Animals : an open access journal from MDPI·2026
Same author

Jane Goodall's merits for the ethological community.

Neuroscience and biobehavioral reviews·2025
Same author

Is dogs' tendency to follow human misleading communicative cues influenced by humans' auditory perspective?

Animal cognition·2025
Same journal

Rank and payoff biases influence subject choices in a foraging task among sanctuary chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes).

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Buzzed but not elated? Effect of ethanol on cognitive judgement bias in honeybees.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Dogs tuned to conspecific vocalizations: behavioral evidence for a voice processing preference.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Variation in song structure does not predict associative learning performance in zebra finches (Taeniopygia castanotis) raised under controlled cultural conditions.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Executive functioning in wild guppies: investigating the impact of a pharmaceutical pollutant.

Animal cognition·2026
Same journal

Performance of sheep and goats in a delay of gratification task.

Animal cognition·2026
See all related articles

Animals using tools, like percussors for cracking nuts, consider tool properties. Heavier tools are more effective, requiring fewer strikes to break open hard-shelled fruits, demonstrating sophisticated tool selection in animal behavior.

Area of Science:

  • Animal behavior
  • Cognitive ethology
  • Tool use in animals

Background:

  • Understanding animal cognition requires studying complex behaviors like tool use.
  • The selection of appropriate tools by animals is crucial for task success, yet remains under-explored.
  • Percussive foraging, such as cracking nuts, involves critical tool property assessment.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how tool-using animals assess and select tools based on physical properties.
  • To determine the importance of specific tool characteristics, such as weight, in percussive foraging tasks.

Main Methods:

  • Observational studies of animals engaged in percussive foraging.
  • Analysis of tool properties (e.g., weight, material, shape) used in relation to task success.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Comparative analysis of tool effectiveness based on varying tool characteristics.

    • Main Results:

    • Tool selection by animals is influenced by multiple properties, including weight, material, and shape.
    • Heavier percussors were found to be more efficient, requiring significantly fewer strikes to crack nuts.
    • This suggests animals can assess and utilize critical tool properties for optimal foraging outcomes.

    Conclusions:

    • Animals demonstrate a nuanced understanding of tool properties, particularly weight, in percussive tasks.
    • The ability to select effective tools highlights advanced cognitive abilities in tool-using species.
    • Future research should explore the limits of this property assessment in diverse animal populations.