Prenatal tobacco use and risk of stillbirth: a case-control and bidirectional case-crossover study

Hamisu M Salihu1, Puza P Sharma, Darios Getahun

  • 1Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ 08901-1977, USA. hamisu.salihu@gmail.com

We sought to estimate the association between prenatal smoking and stillbirth in a longitudinal cohort using two study designs: a case-control study and a bidirectional case-crossover study. The analysis was conducted using the Missouri maternally linked cohort dataset from 1978 through 1997. In the case-control study, each mother contributed only one birth to the analysis. For the bidirectional crossover design, analysis was restricted to women who gave birth to at least one stillbirth, and the controls comprised all live births before and after the stillbirth. The independent association between prenatal smoking and stillbirth was computed using nonconditional (case-control design) and conditional (bidirectional case-crossover design) logistic regression. Prenatal smoking decreased from 29.7% in 1978 to 21.2% by 1997 (p<.001). The absolute risk of stillbirth was greater among smokers (7.7/1000) than nonsmokers (5.3/1000), p<.001. In the case-control design, the risk of stillbirth was 34% greater among smokers than nonsmokers (OR = 1.34, 95% CI 1.26-1.43). For each 10-unit increase in the number of cigarettes consumed per day prenatally, the likelihood of stillbirth rose by about 14% (p<.001). In the bidirectional case-crossover design, the association between stillbirth and smoking during pregnancy was confirmed, although the magnitude of the relationship was smaller (OR = 1.20, 95% CI 1.03-1.39). In conclusion, we found prenatal smoking to be a risk factor for stillbirth even after minimizing the influence of known and unknown sources of confounding as well as changes in temporal trend in prenatal smoking.

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data01:25

Statistical Methods for Analyzing Epidemiological Data

Epidemiological data primarily involves information on specific populations' occurrence, distribution, and determinants of health and diseases. This data is crucial for understanding disease patterns and impacts, aiding public health decision-making and disease prevention strategies. The analysis of epidemiological data employs various statistical methods to interpret health-related data effectively. Here are some commonly used methods:
Teratogenicity01:07

Teratogenicity

The ability of a drug to produce structural deformations and functional abnormalities in the developing embryo or the fetus is called teratogenicity, and the drug producing this effect is known as a teratogen. Teratogenic effects include stillbirth, miscarriage, intrauterine growth restriction, and neurocognitive delay. A teratogen may affect the embryo at different stages of development, which is important in determining the type and extent of the damage. During blastocyst formation, the early...
Development of the Oral Microbiota01:28

Development of the Oral Microbiota

The establishment of the oral microbiome begins before birth, challenging the long-held belief that the fetal oral cavity is sterile. The presence of oral microbes such as Streptococcus and Fusobacterium in amniotic fluid suggests that microbial exposure may occur in utero, potentially through translocation from the maternal oral or gastrointestinal tract. This early colonization primes the neonatal immune system and sets the stage for subsequent microbial succession. Maternal health,...