Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Using spatial frequency scales for processing face features and face configuration: an ERP analysis.

Anastasia V Flevaris1, Lynn C Robertson, Shlomo Bentin

  • 1Department of Psychology University of California at Berkeley, CA, USA. ani@berkeley.edu

Brain Research
|January 15, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Weaker neural suppression in autism.

Nature communications·2020
Same author

The attentional repulsion effect and relative size judgments.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2018
Same author

Reduced auditory cortical adaptation in autism spectrum disorder.

eLife·2018
Same author

Alternative outcomes create biased expectations regarding the received outcome: Evidence from event-related potentials.

Neuropsychologia·2018
Same author

Suppression and facilitation of human neural responses.

eLife·2018
Same author

Changes in the distribution of sustained attention alter the perceived structure of visual space.

Vision research·2016
Same journal

Targeting neurodevelopmental miR132-3p promotes neuroprotection and axon regeneration after optic nerve injury in mice.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Variability in acoustic startle response and prepulse inhibition across adulthood in Fragile X messenger ribonucleoprotein 1 knockout mice.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Transcriptome-guided modeling reveals insulin-related metabolic dysfunction in SCA3 mouse cerebellum.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Intranasal stromal cell-derived factor-1α mitigates parkinsonian deficits via dual modulation of neuroinflammation and gut microbiota in MPTP-induced models.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Emotions, the amygdala, and the right hemisphere.

Brain research·2026
Same journal

Electroacupuncture treatment enhances hippocampal growth hormone level and restores mitochondrial function in vascular dementia rats.

Brain research·2026
See all related articles

Spatial filtering impacts face detection. The N170-effect, an early brain response, is modulated by spatial frequencies, with face inversion effects specifically linked to low-spatial frequencies.

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Neuroscience
  • Visual Perception

Background:

  • The N170-effect is an early electrophysiological marker of face detection.
  • Spatial frequency processing plays a crucial role in visual perception, including face recognition.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate how spatial filtering influences the N170-effect.
  • To differentiate the roles of feature analysis versus configural analysis in face detection.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized spatial frequency filtering to manipulate stimuli, altering feature and configural processing.
  • Compared N170-effects for upright faces, inverted faces, and isolated inner face components.
  • Examined responses across low- and high-spatial frequency scales.

Main Results:

Related Experiment Videos

  • N170-effects for upright faces and isolated features were consistent across spatial frequencies.
  • The face inversion effect was primarily observed with broadband and low-spatial frequency stimuli.
  • Spatial filtering differentially affected feature and configural processing of faces.

Conclusions:

  • The N170-effect is sensitive to both low- and high-spatial frequency information.
  • Face detection mechanisms differ based on configural manipulation (e.g., inversion vs. isolated features).
  • Distinct processing pathways may underlie different types of configural encoding in face perception.