Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Botox: shaken, not stirred.

Nadia A Kazim1, Evan H Black

  • 1Department of Ophthalmology, Kresge Eye Institute, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan 48201, USA.

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
|January 23, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Anatomy of Lower Eyelid Fat Pad Vasculature as Found in Lower Eyelid Blepharoplasties.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2025
Same author

Modulation of Intraocular Pressure Following Short-Term Periocular Triamcinolone 0.025% in Oculoplastic Surgery.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2025
Same author

Central Core Myopathy: A Case Report of a Rare Etiology of Myogenic Blepharoptosis.

Journal of neuro-ophthalmology : the official journal of the North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society·2021
Same author

Adult Versus Pediatric Relapse and Recurrence in Orbital Inflammatory Syndrome.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2020
Same author

Effects of Aspirin on Postoperative Bruising and Bleeding Complications in Upper Eyelid Surgery.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2020
Same author

Ophthalmic Eosinophilic Granulomatosis With Polyangiitis (Churg-Strauss Syndrome): A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2018
Same journal

Porocarcinoma Arising in a Long-Standing Eviscerated Socket.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Hyper Immunoglobulin E Syndrome With Conjunctival Molluscum Contagiosum.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Ethmoiditis Mimicking Acute Dacryocystitis-An Underreported Pathology.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Orbital Inflammatory Syndrome Associated with Bispecific T-Cell Engager Therapy: Case and Literature Review.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

A Rare Pedunculated Lobular Capillary Hemangioma of the Conjunctiva.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same journal

Core Oculoplastic Procedure Skills for the Comprehensive Ophthalmologist: A Consensus by Delphi Methodology.

Ophthalmic plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
See all related articles

Vigorously reconstituting botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) does not alter its efficacy or duration. This study found no significant difference in eyebrow excursion between gently and vigorously reconstituted BoNT-A injections.

Area of Science:

  • Ophthalmology
  • Neurology
  • Aesthetic Medicine

Background:

  • Botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A) is widely used for cosmetic and therapeutic applications.
  • Proper reconstitution of BoNT-A is crucial for predictable clinical outcomes.
  • The effect of vigorous reconstitution on BoNT-A's efficacy and duration is not well-established.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if vigorous reconstitution of BoNT-A affects its clinical effect and duration.
  • To compare the efficacy and duration of BoNT-A reconstituted vigorously versus gently.

Main Methods:

  • Prospective, double-blinded, randomized study involving 7 patients.
  • BoNT-A was reconstituted vigorously on one half of the forehead and gently on the other.
  • Eyebrow excursion was measured at baseline, 1 week, and monthly for 6 months.

Related Experiment Videos

Main Results:

  • No statistically significant difference in eyebrow excursion was observed between the two reconstitution methods.
  • The duration of effect was comparable for both gently and vigorously reconstituted BoNT-A.

Conclusions:

  • Vigorous reconstitution of BoNT-A maintains its clinical effect and duration.
  • Current reconstitution guidelines may be more stringent than necessary for achieving desired outcomes.