Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Errors occurring during blood pressure monitoring

Blood pressure monitoring is a crucial clinical procedure in diagnosing and managing various cardiovascular conditions. Despite its significance, the accuracy of blood pressure measurements can be compromised by multiple factors, potentially leading to either falsely high or low readings. These inaccuracies are critical as they can significantly impact patient care. So, it is vital to understand these challenges deeply and adopt strategic approaches to minimize errors.
Several factors...

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

Guidelines for Nursing Documentation I

Quality documentation and reporting share essential characteristics that ensure they are practical and valuable resources for those who use them. These characteristics are:
Factual:
The following points emphasize the significance of upholding accurate and unbiased documentation in healthcare.

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Pre-Procedural Guidelines for Assessing Blood Pressure

Accurate blood pressure assessment is crucial for diagnosing and managing various health conditions. To ensure the reliability of these measurements, healthcare professionals must adhere to standardized pre-procedural guidelines. These guidelines enhance patient safety and improve the overall quality of healthcare. The following steps are essential for obtaining accurate and consistent blood pressure readings, from using the appropriate tools to ensuring effective communication with the patient.

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Bias in Epidemiological Studies

Biases can arise at various stages of research, from study design and data collection to analysis and interpretation. Recognizing and addressing these biases is essential to ensure the validity and reliability of epidemiological findings.Broadly speaking, biases in epidemiology fall into three main categories: selection bias, information bias, and confounding. A more detailed description of possible biases is:

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

Documentation of Nursing Diagnosis

The nurse documents nursing diagnoses and enters them into the patient record. The identified patient's nursing diagnosis is either written out with a plan of care or entered into the electronic health record.
In some settings, data-driven computerized decision support systems are in place, allowing for more accurate nursing diagnoses. The database within one of these systems includes diagnostic labels defining characteristics, activities, and indicators for nursing. A nurse enters assessment...

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches

Biopharmaceutical studies constitute a vital field aiming to enhance drug delivery methods and refine therapeutic approaches, drawing upon diverse interdisciplinary knowledge. In research methodologies, the choice between controlled and non-controlled studies significantly influences the study's reliability and accuracy.
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Revue medicale suisse·2026

Same author

Electronic cigarette for smoking cessation: a fast-track Delphi consensus of French-speaking experts.

Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique·2025

Same author

[Treatment for smoking cessation : situation in 2025].

Revue medicale suisse·2025

Same author

[Health promotion and prevention in municipalities : levers and actions].

Revue medicale suisse·2025

Same author

Revue medicale suisse·2025

Same author

Revue medicale suisse·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an (A)BSL-4 Laboratory: 4. Medical Imaging Procedures

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an (A)BSL-4 Laboratory: 4. Medical Imaging Procedures

Published on: October 3, 2016

[Reading medical articles--what pitfalls to avoid].

Nicolas Rodondi¹, Jacques Cornuz

¹PMU, Université de Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne.

Revue Medicale Suisse

|January 25, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Primary care physicians face challenges interpreting medical studies. Be cautious of biased results, odds ratios misinterpreted as relative risks, and surrogate markers in drug trials.

More Related Videos

Scanning Dos and Don'ts: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Children Aged 3 to 5 Years to Assess Brain Structure and Function

Scanning Dos and Don'ts: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Children Aged 3 to 5 Years to Assess Brain Structure and Function

Published on: March 10, 2026

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 8, 2026

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an (A)BSL-4 Laboratory: 4. Medical Imaging Procedures

Safety Precautions and Operating Procedures in an (A)BSL-4 Laboratory: 4. Medical Imaging Procedures

Published on: October 3, 2016

Scanning Dos and Don'ts: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Children Aged 3 to 5 Years to Assess Brain Structure and Function

Scanning Dos and Don'ts: Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Awake Children Aged 3 to 5 Years to Assess Brain Structure and Function

Published on: March 10, 2026

Area of Science:

Evidence-based medicine
Medical literature interpretation
Clinical research methodology

Context:

Primary care physicians (PCPs) require critical appraisal skills for medical literature.
Navigating potential biases in study results is crucial for informed clinical decision-making.
Conflicting guidelines and expert opinions complicate evidence-based practice.

Purpose:

To highlight common pitfalls in medical literature interpretation for PCPs.
To guide PCPs in critically evaluating study outcomes, particularly odds ratios and surrogate markers.
To advise on the judicious adoption of new drugs and screening practices.

Summary:

Odds ratios are frequently misinterpreted as relative risks, inflating perceived risk factor impact.
Randomized controlled trials using surrogate markers instead of clinical outcomes require cautious interpretation.
Observational studies for screening often present biased or conflicting findings.

Impact:

Promotes critical appraisal of medical literature by primary care physicians.
Reduces the risk of premature adoption of interventions based on flawed evidence.
Encourages evidence-based practice by emphasizing the need for robust clinical trial data.