Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Knowledge development, quality improvement, and research ethics.

Richard W Redman1

  • 1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA.

Research and Theory for Nursing Practice
|February 2, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Doctor-Patient Relationship, Partnership Theory, and the Patient as Partner: Finding a Balance Between Domination and Partnership.

Health care analysis : HCA : journal of health philosophy and policy·2024
Same author

The transition from inquiry to evidence to actionable clinical knowledge: A proposed roadmap.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2021
Same author

Scientism recognizes evidence only of the quantitative/general variety.

Journal of evaluation in clinical practice·2019
Same author

Predictors of Turnover Among Asian Foreign-Educated Nurses in Their 1st Year of US Employment.

The Journal of nursing administration·2018
Same author

Communication Between Acute Care Hospitals and Skilled Nursing Facilities During Care Transitions: A Retrospective Chart Review.

Journal of gerontological nursing·2016
Same author

Turnover and Associated Factors in Asian Foreign-Educated Nurses.

The Journal of nursing administration·2016
Same journal

Moral Distress in Nurses Caring for Undocumented Immigrants: A Concept Analysis.

Research and theory for nursing practice·2026
Same journal

Predicting Preschool Children's Screen Time: The Role of Parental Digital Habits and Bandura's Social Learning Theory.

Research and theory for nursing practice·2026
Same journal

Stress and Resilience in Parents of Children With Chronic Health Conditions: Adapting an Existing Model to Guide Future Research.

Research and theory for nursing practice·2026
Same journal

Giving Trauma Survivors a Voice: Initial Steps of Validating a Trauma-Informed Care Patient-Perception Instrument.

Research and theory for nursing practice·2026
Same journal

Unpredictability in Inpatient Nursing Work: An Evolutionary Concept Analysis.

Research and theory for nursing practice·2026
Same journal

Social Determinants of Health: A Concept Analysis.

Research and theory for nursing practice·2026
See all related articles

Research and quality improvement initiatives significantly advance healthcare. Understanding their distinct yet related roles, especially ethical considerations in quality improvement projects, is crucial for scientific progress and better patient care.

Area of Science:

  • Healthcare Improvement Science
  • Medical Research Ethics

Background:

  • Healthcare advances stem from both scientific research and quality improvement (QI) activities.
  • Scientists focus on knowledge generation and theory testing, while clinicians drive practice and patient care improvements.
  • The distinction and relationship between research and QI have historically been unclear.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the contributions of quality improvement activities in healthcare.
  • To delineate the relationship between research and quality improvement.
  • To identify ethical challenges specific to quality improvement projects.

Main Methods:

  • Literature review and conceptual analysis.
  • Examination of the roles of scientists and clinicians in healthcare improvement.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ethical framework analysis applied to quality improvement initiatives.

    • Main Results:

    • Quality improvement projects are distinct from research but share a reliance on precise measurement.
    • QI activities offer valuable insights into practice-based improvements.
    • Ethical considerations for QI projects require careful attention and specific guidelines.

    Conclusions:

    • Differentiating research and QI enhances understanding of their respective contributions to healthcare.
    • Recognizing the unique ethical landscape of QI is essential for responsible implementation.
    • Further clarification supports both scientific advancement and improved patient outcomes.