Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Exploring heterogeneity in meta-analyses: needs, resources and challenges.

Hairong Xu1, Robert W Platt, Zhong-Cheng Luo

  • 1Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Sainte-Justine, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada.

Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology
|February 22, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Targeted discovery of anti-skin aging peptides from Camelus bactrianus placenta: Multi-activity screening, network pharmacology, and in vitro validation focusing on MMP-1 inhibition.

Journal of ethnopharmacology·2026
Same author

Data-informed optimization of CAR T-cell therapy long-term follow-up.

Journal for immunotherapy of cancer·2026
Same author

Phosphate scarcity governs methane production in the global open ocean.

Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America·2026
Same author

Pimicotinib versus placebo for tenosynovial giant cell tumour (MANEUVER): an international, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

Lancet (London, England)·2026
Same author

Retraction notice to "Long noncoding RNA RP11-766N7.4 functions as a tumor suppressor by regulating epithelial-mesenchymal transition in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma" [Biomed. Pharmacother. 88 (2017) 778-785].

Biomedicine & pharmacotherapy = Biomedecine & pharmacotherapie·2026
Same author

Axicabtagene ciloleucel in combination with rituximab for refractory large B cell lymphoma: the phase 2, single-arm ZUMA-14 trial.

Nature cancer·2026
Same journal

Neonatal Adverse Outcomes in Métis Children in Alberta, Canada: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Race, Place and Preterm Birth.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2026
Same journal

An Epidemiologic First Principles Approach to Assessing Changes in the Frequency of Early Term Birth.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Lower Risk of Developing Gestational Diabetes Mellitus in the Group Prenatal Care Model.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2026
Same journal

When More Is Not Better: A Balanced View of Haemoglobin Concentrations During Pregnancy.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2026
Same journal

Maternal Haemoglobin and Stillbirth Risk: Implications for Policy and Practice.

Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology·2026
See all related articles

Investigating heterogeneity in meta-analysis is crucial but challenging. This review examines methods for exploring statistical heterogeneity in perinatal health meta-analyses published between 2005 and 2007.

Area of Science:

  • Medical research
  • Biostatistics
  • Perinatal health

Background:

  • Heterogeneity is a critical challenge in meta-analysis.
  • Understanding and addressing heterogeneity is essential for reliable results.
  • Previous reviews have not specifically focused on the investigation of heterogeneity in perinatal health meta-analyses.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To review standard and graphical methods for exploring heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
  • To assess the approaches used to investigate heterogeneity in perinatal health meta-analyses published between January 2005 and April 2007.
  • To evaluate how statistical testing for heterogeneity, handling significant findings, and analysis in the presence of heterogeneity were conducted.

Main Methods:

  • Systematic literature review of meta-analyses.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Focus on publications from January 2005 to April 2007.
  • Analysis of methods used to investigate statistical heterogeneity.

    • Main Results:

    • Assessment of statistical testing for heterogeneity (e.g., Cochran's Q, I-squared).
    • Evaluation of how statistically significant heterogeneity was handled (e.g., subgroup analysis, meta-regression).
    • Examination of analytical approaches in the presence of heterogeneity.

    Conclusions:

    • The study highlights the importance of rigorous investigation of heterogeneity in meta-analysis.
    • Findings provide insights into common practices and potential areas for improvement in perinatal health meta-analyses.
    • Recommendations for standardized approaches to heterogeneity assessment in future meta-analyses.