Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Data Acquisition Protocol for Determining Embedded Sensitivity Functions
Published on: April 20, 2016
[Evaluation of the product-specific standard input function for the IMP-ARG method]
Tohru Shiga1, Tomohito Kaji, Tomoya Kohno
1Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hokkaido University Graduate School of Medicine.
To confirm the previous reports demonstrating the difference in the octanol extraction fractions between the currently available two N-isopropyl-4-iodoamphetamine (123I) products (IMP(A) and IMP(B)), we newly developed the standard input function for IMP(B) in 19 healthy volunteers and compared it with the established standard input function, which has been originally generated with IMP(A). The octanol extraction fractions of IMP(B) were stable from 5 minutes to 16 minutes post injection and significantly higher than those of IMP(A). The mCBFs calculated with IMP(B) by using the established standard input function for IMP(A) tended to be higher than those with the combination of IMP(A) and the established standard input function though the difference was not significant. When measured with IMP(B) combined with the correspondent standard input function, mCBFs were identical to those calculated with IMP(A) with the established standard input function, suggesting that the appropriate standard input function should be used according to the product used.
To confirm the previous reports demonstrating the difference in the octanol extraction fractions between the currently available two N-isopropyl-4-iodoamphetamine (123I) products (IMP(A) and IMP(B)), we newly developed the standard input function for IMP(B) in 19 healthy volunteers and compared it with the established standard input function, which has been originally generated with IMP(A). The octanol extraction fractions of IMP(B) were stable from 5 minutes to 16 minutes post injection and significantly higher than those of IMP(A). The mCBFs calculated with IMP(B) by using the established standard input function for IMP(A) tended to be higher than those with the combination of IMP(A) and the established standard input function though the difference was not significant. When measured with IMP(B) combined with the correspondent standard input function, mCBFs were identical to those calculated with IMP(A) with the established standard input function, suggesting that the appropriate standard input function should be used according to the product used.
Related Concept Videos
Data Validation
Key parameters for method validation include:
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Development of Analytical Methods
