Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Testing for Metacognitive Responding Using an Odor-based Delayed Match-to-Sample Test in Rats
Published on: June 18, 2018
Implicit metacognition, explicit uncertainty, and the monitoring/control distinction in animal metacognition
Lisa K Son1, Bennett L Schwartz, Nate Kornell
1Department of Psychology, Barnard College, New York, NY 10025 lson@barnard.edu.
Abstract:
Smith et al. demonstrate the viability of animal metacognition research. We commend their effort and suggest three avenues of research. The first concerns whether animals are explicitly aware of their metacognitive processes. The second asks whether animals have metaknowledge of their own uncertain responses. The third issue concerns the monitoring/control distinction. We suggest some ways in which these issues elucidate metacognitive processes in nonhuman animals.
More Related Videos
04:51A Modified Mirror Test as a Visual Guide for the Self-awareness Trait in Wild Antarctica Penguins, Pygoscelis adeliae
Published on: July 8, 2025
06:11High-definition Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation over Right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex to Enhance Metacognitive Sensitivity
Published on: September 26, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Metacognition
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness
Strategies of Self-Presentation III: Self-Monitoring
Introspection
Self-Awareness and Its Effects
Subconsciousness and No Awareness
An illustrative example of subconscious processing is its role in problem-solving. Often, individuals...