Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
Nash equilibrium, team reasoning and cognitive hierarchy theory
1School of Economics, University of East Anglia, Norwich, UK. r.sugden@uea.ac.uk
Abstract:
This paper comments on two experiments, carried out by Colman, Pulford and Rose, which investigate the prevalence of team reasoning. I argue that because the first experiment uses 'decomposable' games, it cannot discriminate between team-reasoning and the conceptually distinct 'prosocial' orientation. In the second experiment, Colman et al. find more support for the team reasoning hypothesis than for the rival hypothesis that subjects choose Nash equilibrium strategies. I suggest that the most credible explanation of the data is that some subjects are team reasoners while others act according to cognitive hierarchy theory.
Related Concept Videos
Reason and Intuition
Equity Theory
The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic
The Influence of Cognition on Affect
Halo Effect
The Representativeness Heuristic