Effect of synaptic plasticity on sensory coding and steady-state filtering properties in the electric sense
Krisztina Szalisznyó1, André Longtin, Leonard Maler
1Department of Biophysics, KFKI Research Institute for Particle and Nuclear Physics of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, P.O. Box 49, H-1525 Budapest, Hungary. szali@sunserv.kfki.hu
Abstract:
Our modeling study examines short-term plasticity at the synapse between afferents from electroreceptors and pyramidal cells in the electrosensory lateral lobe (ELL) of the weakly electric fish Apteronotus leptorhynchus. It focusses on steady-state filtering and coherence-based coding properties. While developed for electroreception, our study exposes general functional features for different mixtures of depression and facilitation. Our computational model, constrained by the available in vivo and in vitro data, consists of a synapse onto a deterministic leaky integrate-and-fire (LIF) neuron. The synapse is either depressing (D), facilitating (F) or both (FD), and is driven by a sinusoidally or randomly modulated Poisson process. Due to nonlinearity, numerically computed input-output transfer functions are used to determine the filtering properties. The gain of the response at each sinusoidally modulated frequency is computed by dividing the fitted amplitudes of the input and output cycle histograms of the LIF models. While filtering is always low-pass for F alone, D alone exhibits a gain resonance (non-monotonicity) at a frequency that decreases with increasing recovery time constant of synaptic depression (tau(d)). This resonance is mitigated by the presence of F. For D, F and FD, coherence improves as the synaptic conductance time constant (tau(g)) increases, yet the mutual information per spike decreases. The information per spike for D and F follows opposite trends as their respective time constants increase. The broadband but non-monotonic gain and coherence functions seen in vivo suggest that D and perhaps FD dynamics are involved at this synapse. Our results further predict that the likely synaptic configuration is a slower tau(g), e.g. via a mixture of AMPA and NMDA synapses, and a relatively smaller synaptic facilitation time constant (tau(f)) and larger tau(d) (with tau(f) smaller than tau(d) and tau(g)). These results are compatible with known physiology.
Related Concept Videos
Integration of Synaptic Events
Postsynaptic Potential (PSP)
There are two types of receptors: ionotropic and metabotropic.
The ionotropic receptor is the membrane protein that has an...
Synaptic Signaling
Most synapses are chemical, meaning an electrical impulse or action potential spurs the release of chemical messengers called neurotransmitters. The neuron sending the signal is called the presynaptic neuron, and the neuron receiving the signal is the postsynaptic neuron.
The presynaptic neuron fires an action potential that...
Synaptic Signaling
The Role of Ion Channels in Neuronal Computation
Sometimes a single EPSP is strong enough to induce an action potential in the postsynaptic neuron. However, multiple presynaptic inputs must often create EPSPs around the same time for the postsynaptic neuron to be sufficiently depolarized to fire an action potential.
Action Potentials


