Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

Spoken and written dream communication: differences and methodological aspects.

Maria Casagrande1, Paolo Cortini

  • 1Dipartimento di Psicologia, Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza", Maria Casagrande, Via dei Marsi 78, 00185 Rome, Italy. maria.casagrande@uniroma1.it

Consciousness and Cognition
|February 5, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Preserved gaze cueing in Parkinson's disease: Differential temporal modulation of social and non-social attentional orienting.

Behavioural brain research·2026
Same author

The Effect of Sex and Gender-Role on Social Attention: Investigating the Association With Social Skills and Academic Preferences.

International journal of psychology : Journal international de psychologie·2026
Same author

When arrows behave like eyes: Reversal of spatial stroop interference by visual masking.

Cognition·2026
Same author

Prisoners of the Body: The Link Between Interoception and Sleep Paralysis.

Journal of sleep research·2026
Same author

Brain-First vs. Body-First Models in Neurodegenerative Disease: A Perspective Review.

NeuroSci·2026
Same author

How Psychological Trauma Affects Cognitive Functions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Clinical neuropsychiatry·2026
Same journal

Task-induced transient depersonalization- and derealization-like experiences: a comparative examination of mirror gazing and fixed attention tasks.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same journal

Information compression trumps accuracy when viewing groups of faces.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same journal

Memory for scene details in eye-movement behavior, with and without awareness.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same journal

When one part feels, the whole belongs: associations between local touch referral and illusory full-limb ownership in individuals with leg amputation.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same journal

Inhibitory control and mind wandering; more difficult inhibition decreases mind wandering, within limits.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
Same journal

Autism and Aphantasia.

Consciousness and cognition·2026
See all related articles

Spoken dream reports retain more hallucinatory details than written ones, even after accounting for length. The way dreams are reported significantly impacts their representation.

Area of Science:

  • Psycholinguistics
  • Sleep Research
  • Cognitive Science

Background:

  • Spoken and written language exhibit structural differences (clausal-dynamic vs. nominal-synoptic).
  • These differences may influence the representation of experienced dreams, affecting perceptual and narrative features.
  • Previous research has not fully explored how reporting modality impacts dream content analysis.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate if spoken and written dream reports differ in representing dream experiences.
  • To determine if controlling for quantitative differences (e.g., length, repetitions) yields equivalent dream reports across modalities.
  • To assess the impact of reporting modality on features like hallucinatory information and bizarreness.

Main Methods:

  • A psycholinguistic system analyzed 302 participants' (ages 18-40) daily dream reports over 14 days.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Participants provided both tape-recorded (spoken) and written dream diaries.
  • Statistical analyses controlled for report length and sequence effects.

    • Main Results:

    • Written dream reports showed a loss of hallucinatory information compared to spoken reports.
    • Bizarreness features were less completely represented in written reports.
    • Controlling for report length eliminated differences in bizarreness; sequence effects did not alter findings.

    Conclusions:

    • The modality of reporting (spoken vs. written) significantly affects the representation of dream experiences.
    • Written reports may underrepresent certain dream elements, particularly hallucinatory aspects.
    • Future research should consider reporting modality when analyzing dream content and sleep mentation.