Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I

Accountability in nursing is a fundamental principle that underscores the obligation of nurses to take responsibility for their actions and answer for any errors or omissions in patient care. This principle is grounded in the professional, legal, and ethical frameworks that shape nursing practice. For instance, nurses must adhere to all relevant laws, regulations, and practice standards, including guidelines set forth by nursing boards and professional bodies, to ensure their actions comply...

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse II

Professional accountability in nursing is a multifaceted concept that encompasses professional ethics, legal standards, and employment expectations. This framework ensures that nurses maintain and elevate the quality of care while upholding the values of their profession. It compels them to treat patients, families, and colleagues with respect, compassion, and integrity.
For example, a nurse demonstrating respect and compassion might listen attentively to a patient's concerns, provide comfort...

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III

Nurse-to-nurse relationships are legally required to adhere to professional standards, ensuring a respectful and positive working environment. Professional conduct demands that nurses treat all colleagues respectfully and courteously, fostering a productive, supportive workplace. Nurses must actively eliminate bullying, discrimination, and harassment to maintain a safe and inclusive environment.
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II

Nurses' Legal Responsibilities II

Establishing a secure, collaborative nurse-patient relationship is crucial for delivering high-quality care. This relationship, founded on trust, respect, and honesty, enhances the patient's comfort and willingness to share vital health information. For example, a nurse who listens actively and without judgment provides clear information about health conditions and treatment options and respects patient decisions, which builds a trusting relationship.
Communication between nurses and patients...

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is called the fundamental attribution...

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

The Anchoring-and-Adjustment Heuristic

In order to make good decisions, we use our knowledge and our reasoning. Often, this knowledge and reasoning is sound and solid. However, sometimes, we are swayed by biases or by others manipulating a situation. For example, let’s say you and three friends wanted to rent a house and had a combined target budget of $1,600. The realtor shows you only very run-down houses for $1,600 and then shows you a very nice house for $2,000. Might you ask each person to pay more in rent to get the $2,000...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

The effect of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair on golf handicap.

JSES international·2025

Same author

Optical bistability in PECVD silicon-rich nitride.

Optics express·2022

Same author

Demonstration of the DC-Kerr effect in silicon-rich nitride.

Optics letters·2021

Same author

Management of twenty centimeter segmental bone defect of femoral shaft secondary to infected non-union of fracture using masquelet technique: A case report.

International journal of surgery case reports·2021

Same author

User Assessment of a Novel Suspension for a Wheelchair-A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Trial.

Geriatric orthopaedic surgery & rehabilitation·2021

Same author

Thermo-optic properties of silicon-rich silicon nitride for on-chip applications.

Optics express·2020

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Beyond accountability for reasonableness.

Alex Friedman¹

¹Department of Clinical Bioethics at the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892-1156, USA. friedmana@cc.nih.gov

|February 7, 2008

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

Critiquing the Accountability for Reasonableness framework, this study finds its conditions inadequate for health care priority setting. It suggests revising conditions and embracing broader public involvement and open deliberation for fairer decisions.

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Exploring the Role of Deontic Reasoning and World Knowledge in Wason´s Selection Task

Published on: July 22, 2025

Area of Science:

Health Policy
Bioethics
Public Health Decision-Making

Background:

The Accountability for Reasonableness (AFR) framework is widely adopted for health care priority setting.
AFR aims to ensure fair, reasonable, and legitimate priority-setting decisions despite value disagreements.
The framework has become a dominant paradigm in health policy globally.

Purpose of the Study:

To critique the adequacy of the four conditions within the Accountability for Reasonableness framework.
To propose revisions for a more robust and inclusive health care priority-setting procedure.
To address the challenge of widespread value disagreements in health policy.

Main Methods:

Critical analysis of the Accountability for Reasonableness framework's core principles and conditions.
Argumentation based on ethical and political considerations in health care priority setting.
Proposal of alternative approaches to democratic deliberation in health policy.

Main Results:

The four conditions of the Accountability for Reasonableness framework are found to be insufficient for ensuring fair priority setting.
Substantive disagreements on values must be confronted directly, not avoided, for acceptable decisions.
Current limitations in the framework hinder its ability to achieve universally accepted health care priority-setting outcomes.

Conclusions:

The Accountability for Reasonableness framework requires significant revision to adequately address health care priority setting.
Increased public involvement across all stages of deliberation is crucial for legitimacy.
All types of reasons should be considered in democratic deliberation, judged on their merits, not excluded a priori.