Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026
Utilizing the Modified T-Maze to Assess Functional Memory Outcomes After Cardiac Arrest
Published on: January 5, 2018
[Documentation of in-hospital cardiac arrest]
Søren Stagelund1, Freddy Knudsen Lippert
1Rigshospitalet, HovedOrtoCentret, Anaestesi- og Operationsklinikken, København Ø. stagelund@dadlnet.dk
Insights
Hospital staff significantly improved adherence to cardiac arrest treatment guidelines. However, documentation of cardiac arrest events in medical records did not significantly improve, with about a third of cases missing key medication and shock data.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Medical Quality Improvement
- Healthcare Documentation
Context:
- In-hospital cardiac arrest management requires strict adherence to established guidelines.
- Accurate documentation is crucial for quality assessment and protocol compliance.
- A tertiary referral hospital with 1100 beds and comprehensive medical specialities was the study setting.
Purpose:
- To evaluate the extent of cardiac arrest treatment documentation in medical records.
- To assess staff compliance with hospital cardiac arrest treatment protocols in 2005.
- To compare documentation and compliance rates with a previous period (2001).
Summary:
- Medical records of 50 in-hospital cardiac arrests from 2005 were compared to 50 from 2001.
- The Utstein-style reporting guidelines served as the standard for data extraction.
- While guideline compliance significantly improved (P=0.0001), full treatment documentation did not show significant change (P=0.0704).
Impact:
- Significant improvement in staff adherence to cardiac arrest guidelines indicates successful implementation of training or protocols.
- Persistent gaps in documentation, particularly regarding medication dosages and defibrillator shocks, hinder comprehensive quality assessment.
- Future efforts should focus on improving the completeness of medical record documentation for cardiac arrest events to ensure accurate quality monitoring.
Introduction:
Documentation of and staff compliance with guidelines during in-hospital cardiac arrest are very important. The purpose of the study is to clarify to what extent treatment of cardiac arrest was documented and whether the staff followed the hospital's protocol for cardiac arrest treatment in 2005.
Materials And Method:
Medical records for 50 consecutive in-hospital cardiac arrests in 2005 were analysed and compared to 50 consecutive cardiac arrests in 2001. The hospital is a tertiary referral hospital with 1100 beds and all medical specialities available.
Inclusion Criteria:
All in-hospital cardiac arrest calls. Essential data for the in-hospital Utstein-style was used as the golden standard for documentation when reviewing medical records.
Results:
Results are expressed for 2005 (2001), Test: chi2 (Fisher). Treatment documented: Fully: 32 (22). (P=0.0704). Treatment complying with guidelines: Yes: 28. (P=0.0001).
Conclusion:
The percentage of hospital staff following the guidelines for cardiac arrest has improved significantly. The documentation of cardiac arrest as given in the medical records has not improved significantly. The reason is that the lack of data concerning the dosage of medication and/or dosage/number of shocks delivered is missing for about 1/3 of the cases.
Related Concept Videos
01:21Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation I: Adult
01:23Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
01:25Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
01:30Introduction Cardiac Emergencies
01:30Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
01:26Guidelines for Nursing Documentation II
Timely documentation is crucial to ensure continuity of care for patients. Any delays in recording or reporting medical information can result in medical errors and even adverse patient outcomes. From medication administration to diagnostic test results, every detail must be accurately and promptly documented to provide the best possible care for patients.