Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Experiment Videos

The RAST Server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology.

Ramy K Aziz1, Daniela Bartels, Aaron A Best

  • 1Fellowship for Interpretation of Genomes, Burr Ridge, IL 60527, USA. ramy.aziz@gmail.com

BMC Genomics
|February 12, 2008
PubMed
Summary

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Enteropathy produced in mice by intergenerational transmission of small intestinal microbiota from undernourished children.

Nature microbiology·2026
Same author

Multiple clades of regulators contribute to bacterial phosphate homeostasis and <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> pathogenesis.

mBio·2026
Same author

Fatty acid biosynthesis inhibitors fabimycin and triclosan trigger distinct resistance mutations in FabI and potently kill Gram-negative pathogens.

bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology·2026
Same author

Biofilm formation on venovenous ECMO cannulas can lead to re-introduction of pathogens during the decannulation process - a small-scale study reveals new insights when combining cultures and molecular results.

BMC infectious diseases·2026
Same author

Dose-dependent antiviral effects of glycyrrhizin, curcumin, and harmaline against clinical SARS-CoV-2 isolates, including D614G, Omicron BA.5, and Omicron XBB.1.

BMC complementary medicine and therapies·2026
Same author

Exploring differences in the human gut microbiome between Han Chinese and non-Chinese populations.

Genome biology·2026
Same journal

Different genomic footprint of small insertion-deletion and structural variants determines the genetic divergence of indica and japonica rice.

BMC genomics·2026
Same journal

From nurse bee to queen egg: RNA-seq analysis of Apis mellifera eggs shows dietary protein-dependent gene regulation.

BMC genomics·2026
Same journal

A genome-wide association study to identify the genetic loci underlying carbapenem resistance in Acinetobacter baumannii.

BMC genomics·2026
Same journal

Comparative transcriptome analysis to reveal key drought stress-responsive genes in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench).

BMC genomics·2026
Same journal

Tissue identity is the dominant determinant of cross-species transferability of a porcine developmental programme.

BMC genomics·2026
Same journal

Characterization of mitochondrial genomes from three medicinal species of rutaceae and comparative analysis within the family: insights into evolution.

BMC genomics·2026
See all related articles
This summary is machine-generated.

This study introduces an automated service for annotating prokaryotic genomes, accelerating the analysis of bacterial and archaeal DNA sequences. The tool provides accurate and rapid genome annotation, serving as a valuable community resource.

Area of Science:

  • Microbiology
  • Bioinformatics

Background:

  • The rapid increase in prokaryotic genome sequencing outpaces manual annotation capabilities.
  • Accurate and efficient genome annotation is crucial for biological research.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and present a fully automated service for annotating bacterial and archaeal genomes.
  • To provide a rapid and accurate genome annotation resource for the scientific community.

Main Methods:

  • Automated identification of protein-encoding, rRNA, and tRNA genes.
  • Functional gene assignment and subsystem prediction.
  • Metabolic network reconstruction and comparative analysis within the SEED environment.

Main Results:

  • The service delivers annotated genomes within 12-24 hours.

Related Experiment Videos

  • Ensures accuracy, consistency, and completeness of annotations.
  • Over 120 users have annotated more than 350 genomes.

    • Conclusions:

    • The automated annotation service serves as a vital community resource.
    • It facilitates rapid and accurate analysis of prokaryotic genomes.
    • Ongoing enhancements aim to further improve annotation quality and service capabilities.