Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Investigation of Plant Interactions Across Common Mycorrhizal Networks Using Rotated Cores
Published on: March 26, 2019
Trade-off between reciprocal mutualists: local resource availability-oriented interaction in fig/fig wasp mutualism
Rui Wu Wang1, Lei Shi, Shi Meng Ai
1Key Laboratory of Cellular and Molecular Evolution, Kunming Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, Yunnan, 650223, China. wangrw@mail.kiz.ac.cn
Co-operation between figs and fig wasps is conditional, breaking down when resources are scarce. Repressing pollinator offspring is crucial for maintaining mutualism and preventing conflict over limited resources.
Area of Science:
- Evolutionary Biology
- Mutualism Studies
- Ecology
Background:
- Mechanisms preventing conflict in cooperative systems are a major evolutionary biology problem.
- Previous hypotheses include self-restraint, dispersal, and spatial constraints to maintain cooperation.
- The obligate fig-fig wasp mutualism serves as a model to test these hypotheses.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if self-restraint, dispersal, and spatial constraints sufficiently maintain stable cooperation between figs and fig wasps.
- To determine the conditions under which cooperation or conflict occurs in the fig-fig wasp mutualism.
- To identify key factors crucial for the maintenance and evolution of cooperation in this system.
Main Methods:
- Observational study of obligate cooperation between *Ficus racemosa* and *Ceratoslen fusciceps*.
- Correlation analysis of fig seed viability with pollinator offspring (galls) under varying flower availability and foundress numbers.
- Experimental manipulation of foundress numbers to assess resource competition dynamics.
Main Results:
- Fig seed viability positively correlates with wasp offspring when vacant female flowers are abundant and foundress numbers are low.
- A negative correlation emerges when vacant female flowers are scarce and foundress numbers increase.
- The interaction is conditional: cooperation prevails with plentiful resources, while conflict arises when resources are limited.
Conclusions:
- Existing hypotheses (self-restraint, dispersal, spatial heterogeneity) are insufficient to prevent symbiont over-exploitation of resources.
- Conflict arises when local resources become saturated with symbionts, disrupting cooperation.
- Repressing symbiont proliferation during resource limitation is vital for maintaining and evolving mutualistic cooperation.
Related Concept Videos
Symbiosis
Microbial Interactions: Mutualism
Ecological Niches
Microbial Interactions: Cooperation
Microbial Interactions: Predation
Epiphytes, Parasites, and Carnivores
