Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Statistical Hypothesis Testing01:16

Statistical Hypothesis Testing

Hypothesis testing is a critical statistical procedure facilitating informed, evidence-based decisions. It begins with a hypothesis, which is a tentative explanation, or a prediction about a population parameter. This hypothesis can be either a null hypothesis (H0), indicating no effect or difference, or an alternative hypothesis (Ha), suggesting an effect or difference.
Statistical significance measures the probability that an observed result occurred by chance. If this probability, known as...
Null and Alternative Hypotheses01:16

Null and Alternative Hypotheses

The actual hypothesis testing begins by considering two hypotheses. They are termed  the null hypothesis and the alternative hypothesis. These hypotheses contain opposing viewpoints.
The null hypothesis, denoted by H0 is a statement of no difference between the variables—they are not related. This can often be considered the status quo. As  a result if you cannot accept the null, it requires some action.
The alternative hypothesis, denoted by H1 or Ha, is a claim about the population that is...
Types of Hypothesis Testing01:11

Types of Hypothesis Testing

There are three types of hypothesis tests: right-tailed, left-tailed, and two-tailed.
When the null and alternative hypotheses are stated, it is observed that the null hypothesis is a neutral statement against which the alternative hypothesis is tested. The alternative hypothesis is a claim that instead has a certain direction. If the null hypothesis claims that p = 0.5, the alternative hypothesis would be an opposing statement to this and can be put either p > 0.5, p < 0.5, or p ≠ 0.5.
What is a Hypothesis?01:14

What is a Hypothesis?

A hypothesis can be a simple sentence or statement about a property or any phenomenon observed or predicted for a population. It is usually a claim about a  property of the population. It can be stated for any field observations or experiments. A hypothesis statement cannot be said to be right or wrong as it is merely a statement. It needs to be tested through an elaborate data collection process and an appropriate statistical test. A hypothesis should be a general but not a vague statement. It...
Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence01:16

Hypothesis Test for Test of Independence

The test of independence is a chi-square-based test used to determine whether two variables or factors are independent or dependent. This hypothesis test is used to examine the independence of the variables. One can construct two qualitative survey questions or experiments based on the variables in a contingency table. The goal is to see if the two variables are unrelated (independent) or related (dependent). The null and alternative hypotheses for this test are:
H0: The two variables (factors)...
Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data01:16

Statistical Inference Techniques in Hypothesis Testing: Parametric Versus Nonparametric Data

Statistical inference techniques, paramount in hypothesis testing, differentiate into two broad categories: parametric and nonparametric statistics.
Parametric statistics, as the name suggests, assumes that data follow a specific distribution, often a normal distribution. This assumption enables robust hypothesis testing and estimation. Parametric methods, like the Student's t-test or Goodness-of-fit test, are frequently employed in biostatistics due to their robustness. For instance, comparing...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-locus Models of Deleterious Epimutation-Selection Balance and the Evolution of Recombination Modifiers.

G3 (Bethesda, Md.)·2026
Same author

Correction: Killer whale respiration rates.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Incorporating sparse labels into hidden Markov models using weighted likelihoods improves accuracy and interpretability in biologging studies.

PloS one·2025
Same author

Geographic variation in evolutionary rescue under climate change in a crop pest-predator system.

Evolutionary applications·2024
Same author

Killer whale respiration rates.

PloS one·2024
Same author

Deleterious mutation/epimutation-selection balance with and without inbreeding: a population (epi)genetics model.

Genetics·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Hypothesis testing in comparative and experimental studies of function-valued traits.

Cortland K Griswold1, Richard Gomulkiewicz, Nancy Heckman

  • 1School of Biological Sciences, Washington State University, Pullman, WA 99164, USA. ckg@email.arizona.edu

Evolution; International Journal of Organic Evolution
|February 13, 2008
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Functional methods offer greater statistical power than multivariate approaches for analyzing function-valued traits in evolutionary biology. These methods better utilize data by preserving order and spacing, leading to more robust comparisons between groups.

More Related Videos

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis
10:08

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis

Published on: August 12, 2019

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 7, 2026

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients
07:34

Probing the Limits of Egg Recognition Using Egg Rejection Experiments Along Phenotypic Gradients

Published on: August 22, 2018

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis
10:08

Genetic Mapping of Thermotolerance Differences Between Species of Saccharomyces Yeast via Genome-Wide Reciprocal Hemizygosity Analysis

Published on: August 12, 2019

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups
14:14

The Innovation Arena: A Method for Comparing Innovative Problem-Solving Across Groups

Published on: May 13, 2022

Area of Science:

  • Evolutionary Biology
  • Biostatistics
  • Genomics

Background:

  • Function-valued traits are common in evolutionary studies, influenced by development, physiology, and environment.
  • Key biological examples include gene expression over time and physiological responses to environmental changes.
  • Determining differences in these traits between groups is a fundamental question in evolutionary biology.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To evaluate the statistical power of functional methods versus multivariate methods for analyzing function-valued traits.
  • To investigate the impact of retained data information (order and spacing) in functional analyses.

Main Methods:

  • Comparison of multivariate methods (e.g., repeated-measures ANOVA) and functional methods (e.g., repeated-measures regression).
  • Analysis focused on how methods handle function-valued data, treating them as discrete points versus underlying functions.
  • Evaluation of statistical power in detecting differences between groups based on trait data.

Main Results:

  • Functional methods demonstrated substantially greater statistical power compared to multivariate approaches.
  • The information on the ordering and spacing of data points, retained by functional methods, is crucial for analysis.
  • Multivariate methods, by treating traits as finite lists, discard this valuable information.

Conclusions:

  • Functional statistical methods are superior for detecting differences in function-valued traits between groups.
  • Retaining the full information of function-valued traits enhances the power of statistical analyses in evolutionary studies.
  • Researchers should consider functional methods for more sensitive comparisons of complex biological traits.